Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: A Meta-Analysis

被引:45
作者
Spencer, Chelsea M. [1 ]
Toews, Michelle L. [2 ]
Anders, Kristin M. [3 ]
Emanuels, Sarah K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Couple & Family Therapy Program, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Coll Human Ecol, Res & Grad Studies, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Sch Family Studies & Human Serv, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Appl Family Sci Program, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
youth violence; dating violence; domestic violence; cultural contexts; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; FAMILY VIOLENCE; ADOLESCENT RELATIONSHIPS; LONGITUDINAL PREDICTOR; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; GIRLS USE; VICTIMIZATION; AGGRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/1524838019875700
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Teen dating violence (TDV) is a common problem among adolescents and has been linked to various negative outcomes. This study used Dutton's nested ecological theory to examine risk markers for physical TDV perpetration and examine whether there are significant differences in the strength of risk markers between male and female adolescents. This meta-analysis included 37 studies yielding 126 unique effect sizes for risk markers for physical TDV perpetration in samples from the United States. In the microsystem level, a total of 14 risk markers were examined and in the ontogenetic level, 12 risk markers were examined. Our results revealed that, in the microsystem, physical TDV victimization was the strongest risk marker for physical TDV perpetration. On the ontogenetic level, externalizing behaviors, approval of violence, risky sexual behaviors, alcohol use, depression, and delinquency were the strongest risk markers for TDV perpetration. Conflict resolution skills and responsibility were protective markers against TDV perpetration. When comparing the strength of risk markers between males and females, we found that undifferentiated TDV perpetration and depression were significantly stronger risk markers for female perpetration than male perpetration. We also found that exhibiting controlling behaviors was a significantly stronger risk marker for male TDV perpetration than female TDV perpetration. These findings highlight the importance of the microsystem, specifically the dating relationship itself, when identifying adolescents at risk for TDV perpetration.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 631
页数:13
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Dating violence in teenage girls: parental emotion regulation and racial differences [J].
Ahonen, Lia ;
Loeber, Rolf .
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 26 (04) :240-250
[2]   Healthy relationship education for dating violence prevention among high-risk youth [J].
Antle, Becky F. ;
Sullivan, Dana J. ;
Dryden, Althea ;
Karam, Eli A. ;
Barbee, Anita P. .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2011, 33 (01) :173-179
[3]   Adolescent dating violence - Adolescents follow in their friends', or their parents', footsteps? [J].
Arriaga, XB ;
Foshee, VA .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2004, 19 (02) :162-184
[4]   Consequences of teen dating violence - Understanding intervening variables in ecological context [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. ;
Cross, Charlotte .
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2008, 14 (09) :998-1013
[5]   Interpersonal violence in adolescence - Ecological correlates of self-reported perpetration [J].
Banyard, Victoria L. ;
Modecki, Kathryn L. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2006, 21 (10) :1314-1332
[6]  
Boksa A., 2005, The dynamics of conflict and violence in adolescent heterosexual romantic relationships
[7]  
Borenstein M., 2014, COMPREHENSIVE META A
[8]  
Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to MetaAnalysis, V147, P45
[9]   A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) :97-111
[10]   Adolescent dating violence victimization and psychological well-being [J].
Callahan, MR ;
Tolman, RM ;
Saunders, DG .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT RESEARCH, 2003, 18 (06) :664-681