Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography

被引:0
|
作者
Grosu, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Wiemker, Rafael [3 ]
An, Chansik [1 ]
Obmann, Markus M. [1 ,4 ]
Wong, Eddy [5 ]
Yee, Judy [6 ]
Yeh, Benjamin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Philips Res Labs Hamburg, Rontgenstr 24, D-22335 Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Radiol & Nucl Imaging, Petersgraben 4, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
[5] Philips Healthcare, CT AMI Clin Sci, 100 Pk Ave, Orange Village, OH 44122 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CT; DECT; Spectral CT; Artifacts; Colonography; computed tomographic; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; PARTICIPATION; PREVENTION; POLYPS; IODINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-08831-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the performance of conventional versus spectral-based electronic stool cleansing for iodine-tagged CT colonography (CTC) using a dual-layer spectral detector scanner. Methods We retrospectively evaluated iodine contrast stool-tagged CTC scans of 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 +/- 8 years) undergoing colorectal cancer screening obtained on a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner. One reader identified locations of electronic cleansing artifacts (n = 229) on conventional and spectral cleansed images. Three additional independent readers evaluated these locations using a conventional cleansing algorithm (Intellispace Portal) and two experimental spectral cleansing algorithms (i.e., fully transparent and translucent tagged stool). For each cleansed image set, readers recorded the severity of over- and under-cleansing artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = severe) and readability compared to uncleansed images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used to assess artifact severity, type, and readability (worse, unchanged, or better). Results Compared with conventional cleansing (66% score >= 2), the severity of overall cleansing artifacts was lower in transparent (60% score >= 2, p = 0.011) and translucent (50% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing. Under-cleansing artifact severity was lower in transparent (49% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (39% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (60% score >= 2). Over-cleansing artifact severity was worse in transparent (17% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (14% score >= 2, p = 0.023) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (9% score >= 2). Overall readability was significantly improved in transparent (p < 0.001) and translucent (p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing. Conclusions Spectral cleansing provided more robust electronic stool cleansing of iodine-tagged stool at CTC than conventional cleansing.
引用
收藏
页码:7936 / 7945
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep multi-spectral ensemble learning for electronic cleansing in dual-energy CT colonography
    Tachibana, Rie
    Nappi, Janne J.
    Hironaka, Toru
    Kim, Se Hyung
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 10134
  • [22] Diagnostic performance of CT colonography with limited cathartic preparation in colorectal cancer screening; comparison with conventional colonoscopy
    Amin, Mohammed Farghally
    Hassanin, Ayman Mohammed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (03): : 591 - 598
  • [23] Prospective comparison of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection
    Yee, J
    Hung, RK
    Steinauer-Gebauer, AM
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 340 - 340
  • [24] Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens
    Iafrate, F.
    Iannitti, M.
    Ciolina, M.
    Baldassari, P.
    Pichi, A.
    Laghi, A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 203 - 210
  • [25] Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens
    F. Iafrate
    M. Iannitti
    M. Ciolina
    P. Baldassari
    A. Pichi
    A. Laghi
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 203 - 210
  • [26] Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Graffy, Peter M.
    Weigman, Benjamin
    Deiss-Yehiely, Nimrod
    Hassan, Cesare
    Weiss, Jennifer M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 120 - 129
  • [27] Volume rendering with color coding of tagged stool during endoluminal fly-through CT colonography: Effect on reading efficiency
    Park, Seong Ho
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Kim, Jin Kook
    Kim, Min-Ju
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Min-Yeong
    Kim, Ah Young
    Ha, Hyun Kwon
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) : 1018 - 1027
  • [28] Screening CT Colonography Offers Improved Diagnostic Performance Compared with Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
    Yee, Judy
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 130 - 131
  • [29] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT colonography interpreted by radiologists and radiographers
    Lauridsen C.
    Lefere P.
    Gerke O.
    Hageman S.
    Karstoft J.
    Gryspeerdt S.
    Insights into Imaging, 2013, 4 (4) : 491 - 497
  • [30] Comparison of Meteorological Radar Signal Detectability with Noncoherent and Spectral-Based Processing
    Mead, James B.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) : 723 - 739