Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography

被引:1
作者
Grosu, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Wiemker, Rafael [3 ]
An, Chansik [1 ]
Obmann, Markus M. [1 ,4 ]
Wong, Eddy [5 ]
Yee, Judy [6 ]
Yeh, Benjamin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Philips Res Labs Hamburg, Rontgenstr 24, D-22335 Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Radiol & Nucl Imaging, Petersgraben 4, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
[5] Philips Healthcare, CT AMI Clin Sci, 100 Pk Ave, Orange Village, OH 44122 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CT; DECT; Spectral CT; Artifacts; Colonography; computed tomographic; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; PARTICIPATION; PREVENTION; POLYPS; IODINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-08831-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the performance of conventional versus spectral-based electronic stool cleansing for iodine-tagged CT colonography (CTC) using a dual-layer spectral detector scanner. Methods We retrospectively evaluated iodine contrast stool-tagged CTC scans of 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 +/- 8 years) undergoing colorectal cancer screening obtained on a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner. One reader identified locations of electronic cleansing artifacts (n = 229) on conventional and spectral cleansed images. Three additional independent readers evaluated these locations using a conventional cleansing algorithm (Intellispace Portal) and two experimental spectral cleansing algorithms (i.e., fully transparent and translucent tagged stool). For each cleansed image set, readers recorded the severity of over- and under-cleansing artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = severe) and readability compared to uncleansed images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used to assess artifact severity, type, and readability (worse, unchanged, or better). Results Compared with conventional cleansing (66% score >= 2), the severity of overall cleansing artifacts was lower in transparent (60% score >= 2, p = 0.011) and translucent (50% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing. Under-cleansing artifact severity was lower in transparent (49% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (39% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (60% score >= 2). Over-cleansing artifact severity was worse in transparent (17% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (14% score >= 2, p = 0.023) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (9% score >= 2). Overall readability was significantly improved in transparent (p < 0.001) and translucent (p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing. Conclusions Spectral cleansing provided more robust electronic stool cleansing of iodine-tagged stool at CTC than conventional cleansing.
引用
收藏
页码:7936 / 7945
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Spectroscopic (multi-energy) CT distinguishes iodine and barium contrast material in MICE [J].
Anderson, N. G. ;
Butler, A. P. ;
Scott, N. J. A. ;
Cook, N. J. ;
Butzer, J. S. ;
Schleich, N. ;
Firsching, M. ;
Grasset, R. ;
de Ruiter, N. ;
Campbell, M. ;
Butler, P. H. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) :2126-2134
[2]   Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy ;
Dadswell, Edward ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
von Wagner, Christian ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Yao, Guiqing ;
Kay, Clive ;
Burling, David ;
Faiz, Omar ;
Teare, Julian ;
Lilford, Richard J. ;
Morton, Dion ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Halligan, Steve .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9873) :1194-1202
[3]  
Beebe TJ, 2007, MAYO CLIN PROC, V82, P666
[4]   CT colonography: size reduction of submerged colorectal polyps due to electronic cleansing and CT-window settings [J].
Braeuer, Christian ;
Lefere, Philippe ;
Gryspeerdt, Stefaan ;
Ringl, Helmut ;
Al-Mukhtar, Ali ;
Apfaltrer, Paul ;
Berzaczy, Dominik ;
Fueger, Barbara ;
Furtner, Julia ;
Mueller-Mang, Christina ;
Pones, Matthias ;
Scharitzer, Martina ;
Woitek, Ramona ;
Graser, Anno ;
Weber, Michael ;
Mang, Thomas .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (11) :4766-4774
[5]   Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
[6]   Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer Up to 10 Years After Screening, Surveillance, or Diagnostic Colonoscopy [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Jansen, Lina ;
Knebel, Phillip ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (03) :709-717
[7]   Electronic Cleansing in Fecal-Tagging Dual-Energy CT Colonography Based on Material Decomposition and Virtual Colon Tagging [J].
Cai, Wenli ;
Lee, June-Goo ;
Zhang, Da ;
Kim, Se Hyung ;
Zalis, Michael ;
Yoshida, Hiroyuki .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 62 (02) :754-765
[8]   Informatics in Radiology Dual-Energy Electronic Cleansing for Fecal-Tagging CT Colonography1 [J].
Cai, Wenli ;
Kim, Se Hyung ;
Lee, June-Goo ;
Yoshida, Hiroyuki .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (03) :891-912
[9]   Informatics in Radiology Electronic Cleansing for Noncathartic CT Colonography: A Structure-Analysis Scheme [J].
Cai, Wenli ;
Yoshida, Hiroyuki ;
Zalis, Michael E. ;
Naeppi, Janne Johannes ;
Harris, Gordon J. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (03) :585-602
[10]  
Carmi R., 2008, NUCL SCI S C RECORD, P4780, DOI DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774312