Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography

被引:0
|
作者
Grosu, Sergio [1 ,2 ]
Wiemker, Rafael [3 ]
An, Chansik [1 ]
Obmann, Markus M. [1 ,4 ]
Wong, Eddy [5 ]
Yee, Judy [6 ]
Yeh, Benjamin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Philips Res Labs Hamburg, Rontgenstr 24, D-22335 Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Radiol & Nucl Imaging, Petersgraben 4, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
[5] Philips Healthcare, CT AMI Clin Sci, 100 Pk Ave, Orange Village, OH 44122 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CT; DECT; Spectral CT; Artifacts; Colonography; computed tomographic; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; PARTICIPATION; PREVENTION; POLYPS; IODINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-08831-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the performance of conventional versus spectral-based electronic stool cleansing for iodine-tagged CT colonography (CTC) using a dual-layer spectral detector scanner. Methods We retrospectively evaluated iodine contrast stool-tagged CTC scans of 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 +/- 8 years) undergoing colorectal cancer screening obtained on a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner. One reader identified locations of electronic cleansing artifacts (n = 229) on conventional and spectral cleansed images. Three additional independent readers evaluated these locations using a conventional cleansing algorithm (Intellispace Portal) and two experimental spectral cleansing algorithms (i.e., fully transparent and translucent tagged stool). For each cleansed image set, readers recorded the severity of over- and under-cleansing artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = severe) and readability compared to uncleansed images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used to assess artifact severity, type, and readability (worse, unchanged, or better). Results Compared with conventional cleansing (66% score >= 2), the severity of overall cleansing artifacts was lower in transparent (60% score >= 2, p = 0.011) and translucent (50% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing. Under-cleansing artifact severity was lower in transparent (49% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (39% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (60% score >= 2). Over-cleansing artifact severity was worse in transparent (17% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (14% score >= 2, p = 0.023) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (9% score >= 2). Overall readability was significantly improved in transparent (p < 0.001) and translucent (p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing. Conclusions Spectral cleansing provided more robust electronic stool cleansing of iodine-tagged stool at CTC than conventional cleansing.
引用
收藏
页码:7936 / 7945
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography
    Sergio Grosu
    Rafael Wiemker
    Chansik An
    Markus M. Obmann
    Eddy Wong
    Judy Yee
    Benjamin M. Yeh
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 7936 - 7945
  • [2] Electronic cleansing of tagged residue in CT colonography: what radiologists need to know
    Thomas Mang
    Christian Bräuer
    Stefaan Gryspeerdt
    Martina Scharitzer
    Helmut Ringl
    Philippe Lefere
    Insights into Imaging, 11
  • [3] Electronic cleansing of tagged residue in CT colonography: what radiologists need to know
    Mang, Thomas
    Braeuer, Christian
    Gryspeerdt, Stefaan
    Scharitzer, Martina
    Ringl, Helmut
    Lefere, Philippe
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [4] Mosaic Decomposition: An Electronic Cleansing Method for Inhomogeneously Tagged Regions in Noncathartic CT Colonography
    Cai, Wenli
    Lee, June-Goo
    Zalis, Michael E.
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 30 (03) : 559 - 574
  • [5] Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance
    Juchems, Markus S.
    Ernst, Andrea
    Johnson, Peter
    Virmani, Sunny
    Brambs, Hans-Juergen
    Aschoff, Andrik J.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2009, 34 (03): : 359 - 364
  • [6] Electronic colon-cleansing for CT colonography: diagnostic performance
    Markus S. Juchems
    Andrea Ernst
    Peter Johnson
    Sunny Virmani
    Hans-Juergen Brambs
    Andrik J. Aschoff
    Abdominal Imaging, 2009, 34 : 359 - 364
  • [7] Noncathartic CT Colonography with stool tagging: Performance with and without electronic stool subtraction
    Johnson, C. Daniel
    Manduca, Armando
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    MacCarty, Robert L.
    Carston, Michael J.
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    Mandrekar, Jay N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (02) : 361 - 366
  • [8] Mosaic decomposition method for detection and removal of inhomogeneously tagged regions in electronic cleansing for CT colonography
    Cai, Wenli
    Zalis, Michael
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
  • [9] Electronic cleansing for CT colonography using spectral-driven iterative reconstruction
    Nasirudin, Radin A.
    Nappi, Janne J.
    Hironaka, Toru
    Tachibana, Rie
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 10134
  • [10] Bowel preparation for CT colonography: Comparison of two different cleansing protocols
    Juchems, Markus S.
    Hoffmann, Martin H. K.
    Schmidt, Stefan A.
    Apostel, Anna
    Brambs, Hans-Juergen
    Aschoff, Andrik J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (03) : 460 - 464