Frequency of spontaneous resolution of vasa previa with advancing gestational age

被引:38
作者
Klahr, Rebecca [1 ]
Fox, Nathan S. [1 ,2 ]
Zafman, Kelly [1 ]
Hill, Melissa B. [1 ]
Connolly, Courtney T. [1 ]
Rebarber, Andrei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Maternal Fetal Med Associates PLLC, New York, NY 10128 USA
关键词
placenta previa; ultrasound; migration; vasa previa screening; velamentous cord insertion; LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; PLACENTA PREVIA; ULTRASOUND; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.040
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Vasa previa is a serious obstetric complication that can result in fetal hemorrhage and death on spontaneous labor. Suggested management for vasa previa is elective hospitalization and cesarean delivery before spontaneous labor. There is little reported evidence of the rate of vasa previa resolution over the course of gestation. Identification of the resolution rate and of factors predictive of resolution potentially could improve clinical management and patient counseling. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the resolution rate of vasa previa across gestation and to determine clinical and sono-graphic factors that are associated with vasa previa resolution. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who were diagnosed with vasa previa in a single ultrasound unit between 2005 and 2018. Vasa previa was defined as a fetal vessel within 2 cm of the internal cervical os on transvaginal sonography. The primary outcome was vasa previa resolution, defined as migration of the vasa previa to >2 cm away from the internal os. RESULTS: One hundred women with vasa previa that had been diagnosed at a mean gestational age of 22.8 +/- 4.9 weeks were included. Thirty-nine women (39.0%; 95% confidence interval, 30-49%) had resolution of vasa previa at a mean gestational age of 28.6-4.7 weeks. Factors that were associated with vasa previa resolution were an earlier gestational age at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.10; 95% confidence interval,1.92-19.40), vasa previa did not cover the internal os at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-24.62), and vasa previa was not the result of a resolved placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.01--8.03). One woman with a dichorionic twin pregnancy and vasa previa resolution (at 31 weeks gestation; fetal vessels located 2.8 cm from the internal os) presented at 33 weeks with massive bleeding and fetal death of twin A. It was unclear whether the death was related to vasa previa or placental abruption. CONCLUSION: Thirty-nine percent of vasa previas in our population resolved over the course of pregnancy. Earlier gestational age at diagnosis, vasa previa not covering the internal os, and not having a resolved placenta previa all are associated independently with an increased likelihood of vasa previa resolution. Women with vasa previa should be observed serially to assess for vasa previa resolution, because many will resolve in the third trimester.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The relevance of placental location at 20-23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases
    Becker, RH
    Vonk, R
    Mende, BC
    Ragosch, V
    Entezami, M
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 17 (06) : 496 - 501
  • [2] Vasa Previa Clinical Presentations, Outcomes, and Implications for Management
    Bronsteen, Richard
    Whitten, Amy
    Balasubramanian, Mamtha
    Lee, Wesley
    Lorenz, Robert
    Redman, Mark
    Goncalves, Luis
    Seubert, David
    Bauer, Sam
    Comstock, Christine
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02) : 352 - 357
  • [3] Prenatal sonographic diagnosis findings and obstetric outcome of vasa previa: ultrasound in ten cases
    Catanzarite, V
    Maida, C
    Thomas, W
    Mendoza, A
    Stanco, L
    Piacquadio, KM
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (02) : 109 - 115
  • [4] Chmait RH, 2010, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V23, P459, DOI [10.1080/14767050903156718, 10.3109/14767050903156718]
  • [5] Placenta Previa in the Second Trimester: Sonographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Its Resolution
    Eichelberger, Kacey Y.
    Haeri, Sina
    Kessler, David C.
    Swartz, Anthony
    Herring, Amy
    Wolfe, Honor M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 28 (09) : 735 - 739
  • [6] GIANOPOULOS J, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P488
  • [7] Fetoscopic laser ablation of vasa previa in pregnancy complicated by giant fetal cervical lymphatic malformation
    Hosseinzadeh, P.
    Shamshirsaz, A. A.
    Cass, D. L.
    Espinoza, J.
    Lee, W.
    Salmanian, B.
    Ruano, R.
    Belfort, M. A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (04)
  • [8] Term Vaginal Delivery following Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Type II Vasa Previa
    Johnston, R.
    Shrivastava, V. K.
    Chmait, R. H.
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2014, 35 (01) : 62 - 64
  • [9] Vasa Previa: Prenatal Diagnosis and Outcomes Thirty-five Cases From a Single Maternal-Fetal Medicine Practice
    Kulkarni, Ankita
    Powel, Jennifer
    Aziz, Michael
    Shah, Leena
    Lashley, Susan
    Benito, Carlos
    Oyelese, Yinka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (04) : 1017 - 1024
  • [10] Vasa previa: Prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome
    Lee, W
    Lee, VL
    Kirk, JS
    Sloan, CT
    Smith, RS
    Comstock, CH
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04) : 572 - 576