Validity of the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument: A Juvenile Justice Tool Incorporating Risks, Needs, and Strengths

被引:29
作者
Jones, Natalie J. [1 ]
Brown, Shelley L. [2 ]
Robinson, David [1 ]
Frey, Deanna [3 ]
机构
[1] Orbis Partners, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[3] Alberta Justice & Solicitor Gen, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI); juvenile assessment; strengths; Aboriginal offenders; gender-responsive assessment; STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT; VIOLENCE RISK; ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS; ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; YOUNG OFFENDERS; PEER INFLUENCE; FOLLOW-UP; RECIDIVISM;
D O I
10.1037/lhb0000170
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The primary purpose of this study is to introduce the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI; Orbis Partners, 2000), which is a comprehensive assessment protocol gauging a range of risks, needs, and strengths associated with criminal conduct in juvenile populations. Applied to a sample of 464 juvenile offenders bound by community supervision in Alberta, Canada, the Pre-Screen version of the instrument achieved a high level of accuracy in predicting both general and violent offenses over an 18-month follow-up period (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = .79). No significant differences in overall predictive validity were found across demographic groups, save for the relatively lower level of accuracy achieved in predicting general reoffending across the subsample of girls (AUC = .68). With regard to strengths, a buffering effect was identified whereby high-risk cases with higher levels of strength had superior outcomes compared to their lower strength counterparts. Results suggest that it is advisable to consider the quantitative inclusion of strength-based items in the assessment of juvenile risk.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 194
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Andrews DA, 2010, PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT, 5TH EDITION, P1
[2]   The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment [J].
Andrews, DA ;
Bonta, J ;
Wormith, JS .
CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2006, 52 (01) :7-27
[3]   DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK - A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED METAANALYSIS [J].
ANDREWS, DA ;
ZINGER, I ;
HOGE, RD ;
BONTA, J ;
GENDREAU, P ;
CULLEN, FT .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) :369-404
[4]   Are the Major Risk/Need Factors Predictive of Both Female and Male Reoffending?: A Test With the Eight Domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory [J].
Andrews, Donald A. ;
Guzzo, Lina ;
Raynor, Peter ;
Rowe, Robert C. ;
Rettinger, L. Jill ;
Brews, Albert ;
Wormith, J. Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 56 (01) :113-133
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 200601 PUBL SAF CAN
[6]  
Baird C., 2013, 244477 NAT COUNC CRI
[7]  
Barnoski R., 2003, Changes in Washington State's jurisdiction of juvenile offenders: Examining the impact
[8]   Assessing the Risk of Re-Offending for Juvenile Offenders Using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory [J].
Bechtel, Kristin ;
Lowenkamp, Christopher ;
Latessa, Edward .
JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, 2007, 45 (3-4) :85-108
[9]   Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis [J].
Benda, BB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2005, 49 (03) :325-342
[10]  
BLANCHETTE K, 1996, THESIS CARLETON U OT