Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death

被引:383
作者
Kaminski, Michal F. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wieszczy, Paulina [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Rupinski, Maciej [1 ,4 ]
Wojciechowska, Urszula [3 ]
Didkowska, Joanna [2 ]
Kraszewska, Ewa [4 ]
Kobiela, Jaroslaw [4 ,6 ]
Franczyk, Robert [1 ,4 ]
Rupinska, Maria [1 ,4 ]
Kocot, Bartlomiej [4 ]
Chaber-Ciopinska, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Pachlewski, Jacek [1 ]
Polkowski, Marcin [1 ,4 ]
Regula, Jaroslaw [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, Dept Gastroenterol Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, Dept Canc Prevent, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, Natl Canc Registry Poland, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
[6] Med Univ Gdansk, Invas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Endocrine & Transplant Surg, Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Colon Cancer; Early Detection; Efficacy; Tumor; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; INDICATORS; GUIDELINES; ASSURANCE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The quality of endoscopists' colonoscopy performance is measured by adenoma detection rate (ADR). Although ADR is associated inversely with interval colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer death, the effects of an increasing ADR have not been shown. We investigated whether increasing ADRs from individual endoscopists is associated with reduced risks of interval colorectal cancer and subsequent death. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of individuals who underwent a screening colonoscopy within the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Poland, from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. We collected data from 146,860 colonoscopies performed by 294 endoscopists, with each endoscopist having participated at least twice in annual editions of primary colonoscopy screening. We used annual feedback and quality benchmark indicators to improve colonoscopy performance. We used ADR quintiles in the whole data set to categorize the annual ADRs for each endoscopist. An increased ADR was defined as an increase by at least 1 quintile category, or the maintenance of the highest category in subsequent screening years. Multivariate frailty models were used to evaluate the effects of increased ADR on the risk of interval colorectal cancer and death. RESULTS: Throughout the enrollment period, 219 endoscopists (74.5%) increased their annual ADR category. During 895,916 person-years of follow-up evaluation through the National Cancer Registry, we identified 168 interval colorectal cancers and 44 interval cancer deaths. An increased ADR was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio for interval colorectal cancer of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.88; P =.006), and for cancer death of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.27-0.95; P =.035). Compared with no increase in ADR, reaching or maintaining the highest quintile ADR category (such as an ADR > 24.56%) decreased the adjusted hazard ratios for interval colorectal cancer to 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.63; P =.003), and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.56; P =.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy within a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, we associated increased ADR with a reduced risk of interval colorectal cancer and death.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 105
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy
    Barclay, Robert L.
    Vicari, Joseph J.
    Doughty, Andrea S.
    Johanson, John F.
    Greenlaw, Roger L.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) : 2533 - 2541
  • [2] Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program
    Brenner, Hermann
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Kretschmann, Jens
    Roesch, Thomas
    Pox, Christian
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (02) : 356 - +
  • [3] An Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Improves Detection of Colorectal Adenomas
    Coe, Susan G.
    Crook, Julia E.
    Diehl, Nancy N.
    Wallace, Michael B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (02) : 219 - 226
  • [4] Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2541, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
  • [5] Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Marks, Amy R.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (03) : 656 - 665
  • [6] Quality assurance of training
    Dunckley, Paul
    Elta, Grace
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 397 - 407
  • [7] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate
    Hassan, Cesare
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Zullo, Angelo
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    [J]. UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 3 (02) : 200 - 207
  • [8] Hougaard P, 1995, Lifetime Data Anal, V1, P255
  • [9] Design of the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program: a randomized health services study
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Kraszewska, Ewa
    Rupinski, Maciej
    Laskowska, Milena
    Wieszczy, Paulina
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (12) : 1144 - 1150
  • [10] Adenoma Detection Race at Colonoscopy: The Good and the Bad
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (02) : 273 - 274