Comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:21
作者
Weng, Chenghua [1 ]
Xue, Leixi [1 ]
Wang, Qing [1 ]
Lu, Wentian [1 ]
Xu, Jiajun [1 ]
Liu, Zhichun [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Sanxiang Rd 1055, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; Janus kinase inhibitors; network meta-analysis; rheumatoid arthritis; INADEQUATE RESPONSE; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; DOUBLE-BLIND; BARICITINIB; METHOTREXATE; TOFACITINIB; ADALIMUMAB; TNF; CLASSIFICATION; TOCILIZUMAB;
D O I
10.1177/1759720X21999564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to April 2020. The active drugs included three JAK inhibitors and eight bDMARDs while the control drugs included placebo or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Outcomes include American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) using network meta-analysis with random effects. Results: Eighty-eight RCTs with 31,566 patients were included. All JAK inhibitors and bDMARDs were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (ORs ranging between 3.05 and 5.61), DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.91 and -0.80) and HAQ-DI (WMDs ranging between -0.34 and -0.21). Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib showed relatively good efficacy in these three outcomes according to their relative ranking. Notably, tocilizumab was more effective than other active drugs in DAS28 (WMDs ranging between -1.11 and -0.49). Compared with the lower recommended doses, increasing the doses of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib 4 mg versus 2 mg, tofacitinib 10 mg versus 5 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg versus 15 mg) cannot provide significant additional benefits. In terms of discontinuations for AEs, all active drugs showed no significant difference compared with placebo except certolizumab pegol [OR 1.65, 95% credible interval (CrI) 1.06-2.61] and rituximab (3.17, 1.11-10.80). Conclusions: Tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol and upadacitinib may have relatively good efficacy in patients with RA after treatment failure with csDMARDs. RA patients taking a JAK inhibitor may have a preference for a lower recommended dose.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Aletaha D, 2010, ANN RHEUM DIS, V69, P1580, DOI [10.1136/ard.2010.138461, 10.1002/art.27584]
  • [2] THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    ARNETT, FC
    EDWORTHY, SM
    BLOCH, DA
    MCSHANE, DJ
    FRIES, JF
    COOPER, NS
    HEALEY, LA
    KAPLAN, SR
    LIANG, MH
    LUTHRA, HS
    MEDSGER, TA
    MITCHELL, DM
    NEUSTADT, DH
    PINALS, RS
    SCHALLER, JG
    SHARP, JT
    WILDER, RL
    HUNDER, GG
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03): : 315 - 324
  • [3] Risk profiling for a refractory course of rheumatoid arthritis
    Becede, Manuel
    Alasti, Farideh
    Gessl, Irina
    Haupt, Lukas
    Kerschbaumer, Andreas
    Landesmann, Uriel
    Loiskandl, Michaela
    Supp, Gabriela M.
    Smolen, Josef S.
    Aletaha, Daniel
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2019, 49 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [4] Buckley Felicity, 2015, J Manag Care Spec Pharm, V21, P409
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial
    Burmester, Gerd R.
    Kremer, Joel M.
    Van den Bosch, Filip
    Kivitz, Alan
    Bessette, Louis
    Li, Yihan
    Zhou, Yijie
    Othman, Ahmed A.
    Pangan, Aileen L.
    Camp, Heidi S.
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 391 (10139) : 2503 - 2512
  • [6] Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
    Chaimani, Anna
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Spyridonos, Panagiota
    Salanti, Georgia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [7] Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis
    da Costa, Bruno R.
    Reichenbach, Stephan
    Keller, Noah
    Nartey, Linda
    Wandel, Simon
    Juni, Peter
    Trelle, Sven
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 390 (10090) : E21 - E33
  • [8] Mixed Treatment Comparison of the Treatment Discontinuations of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Desai, Rishi J.
    Hansen, Richard A.
    Rao, Jaya K.
    Wilkins, Tania M.
    Harden, Elizabeth A.
    Yuen, Andrea
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Roubey, Robert
    Jonas, Beth
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Lux, Linda
    Donahue, Katrina E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2012, 46 (11) : 1491 - 1505
  • [9] Filgotinib: First Approval
    Dhillon, Sohita
    Keam, Susan J.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2020, 80 (18) : 1987 - 1997
  • [10] Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
    Dias, S.
    Welton, N. J.
    Caldwell, D. M.
    Ades, A. E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) : 932 - 944