Response-adaptive treatment allocation for survival trials with clustered right-censored data

被引:3
作者
Su, Pei-Fang [1 ]
Cheung, Siu Hung [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Stat, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Stat, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
allocation function; copula model; doubly adaptive biased coin design; total expected hazard; test power; SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION; ASYMPTOTIC PROPERTIES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RANDOMIZATION; DESIGNS; PREVENTION; EFFICIENT;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7652
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A comparison of 2 treatments with survival outcomes in a clinical study may require treatment randomization on clusters of multiple units with correlated responses. For example, for patients with otitis media in both ears, a specific treatment is normally given to a single patient, and hence, the 2 ears constitute a cluster. Statistical procedures are available for comparison of treatment efficacies. The conventional approach for treatment allocation is the adoption of a balanced design, in which half of the patients are assigned to each treatment arm. However, considering the increasing acceptability of responsive-adaptive designs in recent years because of their desirable features, we have developed a response-adaptive treatment allocation scheme for survival trials with clustered data. The proposed treatment allocation scheme is superior to the balanced design in that it allows more patients to receive the better treatment. At the same time, the test power for comparing treatment efficacies using our treatment allocation scheme remains highly competitive. The advantage of the proposed randomization procedure is supported by a simulation study and the redesign of a clinical study.
引用
收藏
页码:2427 / 2439
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, Counting Processes and Survival Analysis
  • [2] A response adaptive randomization platform trial for efficient evaluation of Ebola virus treatments: A model for pandemic response
    Berry, Scott M.
    Petzold, Elizabeth A.
    Dull, Peter
    Thielman, Nathan M.
    Cunningham, Coleen K.
    Corey, G. Ralph
    McClain, Micah T.
    Hoover, David L.
    Russell, James
    Griffiss, J. McLeod
    Woods, Christopher W.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [3] On a class of optimal covariate-adjusted response adaptive designs for survival outcomes
    Biswas, Atanu
    Bhattacharya, Rahul
    Park, Eunsik
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 2444 - 2456
  • [4] MODEL FOR ASSOCIATION IN BIVARIATE LIFE TABLES AND ITS APPLICATION IN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL-STUDIES OF FAMILIAL TENDENCY IN CHRONIC DISEASE INCIDENCE
    CLAYTON, DG
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1978, 65 (01) : 141 - 151
  • [5] THE DOUBLY ADAPTIVE BIASED COIN DESIGN FOR SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS
    EISELE, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1994, 38 (02) : 249 - 261
  • [6] CENTRAL LIMIT-THEOREMS FOR DOUBLY ADAPTIVE BIASED COIN DESIGNS
    EISELE, JR
    WOODROOFE, MB
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1995, 23 (01) : 234 - 254
  • [7] Hu F., 2006, The theory of response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials
  • [8] EFFICIENT RANDOMIZED-ADAPTIVE DESIGNS
    Hu, Feifang
    Zhang, Li-Xin
    He, Xuming
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2009, 37 (5A) : 2543 - 2560
  • [9] Hu FF, 2004, ANN STAT, V32, P268
  • [10] Optimality, variability, power: Evaluating response-adaptive randomization procedures for treatment comparisons
    Hu, FF
    Rosenberger, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 98 (463) : 671 - 678