Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:1
作者
Menditto, Vincenzo G. [1 ]
Maraldo, Antonello [2 ]
Barbadoro, Pamela [3 ]
Maccaroni, Roberto [1 ]
Salvi, Aldo [1 ]
D'Errico, Marcello M. [3 ]
Marasca, Stefano [4 ]
机构
[1] Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Dept Emergency Med, Ancona, Italy
[2] Gen Direct Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
[3] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Ancona, Italy
[4] Univ Politecn Marche, Management Dept, Ancona, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE | 2021年 / 8卷
关键词
patient satisfaction; patient feedback; service excellence; emergency medicine; QUALITY-OF-CARE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; IMPACT; PERSPECTIVES; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1177/23743735211007356
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) is to elicit the perspectives of patients and translate them into a reliable measurement questionnaire. Objectives: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to detect a set of PROs and PRO measurements (PROMs) about patients with isolated trauma of the limbs receiving emergency department (ED) care. Methods: A survey was performed in the ED using a questionnaire among the enrolled patients to identify which proposed outcomes were perceived as important by the patients according to their expectations. Results: Ninety-six consecutive patients were conveniently enrolled. For each item of the questionnaire, the percentage of patients who agreed to perceive it important were calculated. Three items were perceived important by almost 85% of the patients: getting an x-ray (91%; 95% CI: 88%-98%), obtaining a written therapy (94%; 95% CI: 87%-97%), and feeling the physicians' and nurses' empathy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). The ED system was able to satisfy 2 of the 3 agreed PROs in at least 85% of the cases: getting an x-ray (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%) and obtaining a written therapy (97%; 95% CI: 91%-99%). Moreover, in 30/96 patients (31%; 95% CI: 22%-41%), all the PROs were satisfied, and in 75/96 patients (78%; 95% CI: 69%-85%), all agreed PROs were satisfied. Conclusions: Our study shows an example of core of PROs proposed by the ED physicians and agreed by the patients. Moreover, we presented a set of PROMs which could be used to measure the quality of an ED.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare
    Black, Nick
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [2] The accident and emergency department questionnaire: a measure for patients' experiences in the accident and emergency department
    Bos, Nanne
    Sizmur, Steve
    Graham, Chris
    van Stel, Henk F.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [3] Patient satisfaction in the Emergency Department: A review of the literature and implications for practice
    Boudreaux, ED
    O'Hea, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [4] Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review
    Boyce, Maria B.
    Browne, John P.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (09) : 2265 - 2278
  • [5] A framework for measuring quality in the emergency department
    Cameron, P. A.
    Schull, M. J.
    Cooke, M. W.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (09) : 735 - 740
  • [6] Cooke Timothy, 2006, CJEM, V8, P148
  • [7] A qualitative study of emergency physicians' perspectives on PROMS in the emergency department
    Dainty, Katie N.
    Seaton, Bianca
    Laupacis, Andreas
    Schull, Michael
    Vaillancourt, Samuel
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2017, 26 (09) : 714 - 721
  • [8] Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
    Diamond, Ivan R.
    Grant, Robert C.
    Feldman, Brian M.
    Pencharz, Paul B.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Moore, Aideen M.
    Wales, Paul W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 401 - 409
  • [9] Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors
    Howell, D.
    Molloy, S.
    Wilkinson, K.
    Green, E.
    Orchard, K.
    Wang, K.
    Liberty, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (09) : 1846 - 1858
  • [10] Improving the quality of care with performance indicators
    Majeed, Azeem
    Lester, Helen
    Bindman, Andrew
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7626): : 916 - 918