Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? - art. no. 35

被引:127
作者
Stefanovic, S
Rice, DW
Palmer, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Biol, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2148-4-35
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Numerous studies, using in aggregate some 28 genes, have achieved a consensus in recognizing three groups of plants, including Amborella, as comprising the basal-most grade of all other angiosperms. A major exception is the recent study by Goremykin et al. ( 2003; Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1499 1505), whose analyses of 61 genes from 13 sequenced chloroplast genomes of land plants nearly always found 100% support for monocots as the deepest angiosperms relative to Amborella, Calycanthus, and eudicots. We hypothesized that this conflict reflects a misrooting of angiosperms resulting from inadequate taxon sampling, inappropriate phylogenetic methodology, and rapid evolution in the grass lineage used to represent monocots. Results: We used two main approaches to test this hypothesis. First, we sequenced a large number of chloroplast genes from the monocot Acorus and added these plus previously sequenced Acorus genes to the Goremykin et al. ( 2003) dataset in order to explore the effects of altered monocot sampling under the same analytical conditions used in their study. With Acorus alone representing monocots, strongly supported Amborella-sister trees were obtained in all maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses, and in some distance-based analyses. Trees with both Acorus and grasses gave either a well-supported Amborellasister topology or else a highly unlikely topology with 100% support for grasses-sister and paraphyly of monocots (i.e., Acorus sister to "dicots" rather than to grasses). Second, we reanalyzed the Goremykin et al. ( 2003) dataset focusing on methods designed to account for rate heterogeneity. These analyses supported an Amborella-sister hypothesis, with bootstrap support values often conflicting strongly with cognate analyses performed without allowing for rate heterogeneity. In addition, we carried out a limited set of analyses that included the chloroplast genome of Nymphaea, whose position as a basal angiosperm was also, and very recently, challenged. Conclusions: These analyses show that Amborella ( or Amborella plus Nymphaea), but not monocots, is the sister group of all other angiosperms among this limited set of taxa and that the grasses-sister topology is a long-branch-attraction artifact leading to incorrect rooting of angiosperms. These results highlight the danger of having lots of characters but too few and, especially, molecularly divergent taxa, a situation long recognized as potentially producing strongly misleading molecular trees. They also emphasize the importance in phylogenetic analysis of using appropriate evolutionary models.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 35
页数:19
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Phylogeny and divergence of basal angiosperms inferred from APETALA3- and PISTILLATA-like MADS-box genes [J].
Aoki, S ;
Uehara, K ;
Imafuku, M ;
Hasebe, M ;
Ito, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH, 2004, 117 (03) :229-244
[3]  
APG II, 2003, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, V141, P399, DOI [DOI 10.1046/J.1095-8339.2003.T01-1-00158.X, 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158]
[4]   Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny [J].
Barkman, TJ ;
Chenery, G ;
McNeal, JR ;
Lyons-Weiler, J ;
Ellisens, WJ ;
Moore, G ;
Wolfe, AD ;
dePamphilis, CW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (24) :13166-13171
[5]   Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms [J].
Borsch, T ;
Hilu, KW ;
Quandt, D ;
Wilde, V ;
Neinhuis, C ;
Barthlott, W .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 16 (04) :558-576
[6]   Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: Extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers [J].
Bowe, LM ;
Coat, G ;
dePamphilis, CW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (08) :4092-4097
[7]   Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: Effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support [J].
Buckley, TR ;
Simon, C ;
Chambers, GK .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2001, 50 (01) :67-86
[8]   Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: Implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life [J].
Burleigh, JG ;
Mathews, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2004, 91 (10) :1599-1613
[9]  
Chase M.W., 2000, Monocots: Systematics and evolution, P3
[10]   PHYLOGENETICS OF SEED PLANTS - AN ANALYSIS OF NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCES FROM THE PLASTID GENE RBCL [J].
CHASE, MW ;
SOLTIS, DE ;
OLMSTEAD, RG ;
MORGAN, D ;
LES, DH ;
MISHLER, BD ;
DUVALL, MR ;
PRICE, RA ;
HILLS, HG ;
QIU, YL ;
KRON, KA ;
RETTIG, JH ;
CONTI, E ;
PALMER, JD ;
MANHART, JR ;
SYTSMA, KJ ;
MICHAELS, HJ ;
KRESS, WJ ;
KAROL, KG ;
CLARK, WD ;
HEDREN, M ;
GAUT, BS ;
JANSEN, RK ;
KIM, KJ ;
WIMPEE, CF ;
SMITH, JF ;
FURNIER, GR ;
STRAUSS, SH ;
XIANG, QY ;
PLUNKETT, GM ;
SOLTIS, PS ;
SWENSEN, SM ;
WILLIAMS, SE ;
GADEK, PA ;
QUINN, CJ ;
EGUIARTE, LE ;
GOLENBERG, E ;
LEARN, GH ;
GRAHAM, SW ;
BARRETT, SCH ;
DAYANANDAN, S ;
ALBERT, VA .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 1993, 80 (03) :528-580