30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

被引:20
作者
Hoppe, Kara K. [1 ]
Schiff, Melissa A. [1 ,2 ]
Peterson, Suzanne E. [3 ]
Gravett, Michael G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Seattle Childrens, GAPPS, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Balloon catheters; cervical ripening; induction of labor; CESAREAN DELIVERY; UNFAVORABLE CERVIX; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; FOLEY CATHETER; INDUCTION; LABOR; RISK; TERM;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of an 80mL double-balloon catheter versus a 30mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial of women 18 years with a singleton, vertex pregnancy, a reactive non-stress test, and a Bishop score 5 comparing an 80mL double- versus a 30mL single-balloon catheters for cervical ripening. Women were randomly assigned to the two catheter types, stratified 1:1 by nulliparity or multiparity. The primary outcome was achieving a Bishop score 6 at the time of catheter expulsion or removal assessed by chi-squared, stratified by parity.Results: A total of 98 women were included in the analysis (50 in the 80mL double and 48 in the 30mL single-balloon catheter groups). Among nulliparous women, a greater proportion of those randomized to the 80mL double achieved a Bishop score 6 at time of catheter removal (88.0% versus 28.0%; p0.001) and delivered vaginally (60.0% versus 32.0%; p=0.047) compared to those with the 30mL single-balloon catheter. We found no difference by catheter type in achieving a Bishop score 6 or vaginal delivery among multiparous women.Conclusions: These findings suggest the 80mL double-balloon catheter is more effective than the 30mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening and achieving a vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:1919 / 1925
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ACOG PRACT B IND LAB
  • [2] ATAD J, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P146
  • [3] Caughey Aaron B, 2009, Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), P1
  • [4] A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter
    Cromi, Antonella
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Uccella, Stefano
    Agosti, Massimo
    Serati, Maurizio
    Marchitelli, Giulia
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (02) : 125.e1 - 125.e7
  • [5] Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Delaney, Shani
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Vargas, Juan
    Sparks, Teresa N.
    Paul, Kathleen
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (06) : 1239 - 1245
  • [6] Embrey M P, 1967, J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, V74, P44
  • [7] EFFECT OF EARLY AMNIOTOMY ON THE RISK OF DYSTOCIA IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN
    FRASER, WD
    MARCOUX, S
    MOUTQUIN, JM
    CHRISTEN, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (16) : 1145 - 1149
  • [8] Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction
    Gelber, Shari
    Sciscione, Anthony
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) : 642 - 657
  • [9] Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix
    Johnson, DP
    Davis, NR
    Brown, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1565 - 1569
  • [10] Mechanical methods for induction of labour
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Irion, Olivier
    Boulvain, Michel
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03):