30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

被引:20
作者
Hoppe, Kara K. [1 ]
Schiff, Melissa A. [1 ,2 ]
Peterson, Suzanne E. [3 ]
Gravett, Michael G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Seattle Childrens, GAPPS, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Balloon catheters; cervical ripening; induction of labor; CESAREAN DELIVERY; UNFAVORABLE CERVIX; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; FOLEY CATHETER; INDUCTION; LABOR; RISK; TERM;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy of an 80mL double-balloon catheter versus a 30mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial of women 18 years with a singleton, vertex pregnancy, a reactive non-stress test, and a Bishop score 5 comparing an 80mL double- versus a 30mL single-balloon catheters for cervical ripening. Women were randomly assigned to the two catheter types, stratified 1:1 by nulliparity or multiparity. The primary outcome was achieving a Bishop score 6 at the time of catheter expulsion or removal assessed by chi-squared, stratified by parity.Results: A total of 98 women were included in the analysis (50 in the 80mL double and 48 in the 30mL single-balloon catheter groups). Among nulliparous women, a greater proportion of those randomized to the 80mL double achieved a Bishop score 6 at time of catheter removal (88.0% versus 28.0%; p0.001) and delivered vaginally (60.0% versus 32.0%; p=0.047) compared to those with the 30mL single-balloon catheter. We found no difference by catheter type in achieving a Bishop score 6 or vaginal delivery among multiparous women.Conclusions: These findings suggest the 80mL double-balloon catheter is more effective than the 30mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening and achieving a vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:1919 / 1925
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ACOG PRACT B IND LAB
[2]  
ATAD J, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P146
[3]  
Caughey Aaron B, 2009, Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), P1
[4]   A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter [J].
Cromi, Antonella ;
Ghezzi, Fabio ;
Uccella, Stefano ;
Agosti, Massimo ;
Serati, Maurizio ;
Marchitelli, Giulia ;
Bolis, Pierfrancesco .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (02) :125.e1-125.e7
[5]   Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Delaney, Shani ;
Shaffer, Brian L. ;
Cheng, Yvonne W. ;
Vargas, Juan ;
Sparks, Teresa N. ;
Paul, Kathleen ;
Caughey, Aaron B. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (06) :1239-1245
[6]  
Embrey M P, 1967, J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, V74, P44
[7]   EFFECT OF EARLY AMNIOTOMY ON THE RISK OF DYSTOCIA IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN [J].
FRASER, WD ;
MARCOUX, S ;
MOUTQUIN, JM ;
CHRISTEN, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (16) :1145-1149
[8]   Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction [J].
Gelber, Shari ;
Sciscione, Anthony .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03) :642-657
[9]   Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix [J].
Johnson, DP ;
Davis, NR ;
Brown, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1565-1569
[10]   Mechanical methods for induction of labour [J].
Jozwiak, Marta ;
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. ;
Kelly, Anthony J. ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Irion, Olivier ;
Boulvain, Michel .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03)