RSSI Probability Density Functions Comparison Using Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Pearson Distribution

被引:3
作者
Lionis, Antonios [1 ]
Peppas, Konstantinos P. [1 ]
Nistazakis, Hector E. [2 ]
Tsigopoulos, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peloponnese, Informat & Telecommun Dept, Tripoli 22131, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sect Elect Phys & Syst, Dept Phys, Athens 15784, Greece
[3] Hellen Naval Acad, Div Combat Syst Naval Operat Sea Sci Nav Elect &, Athens 15561, Greece
关键词
Jensen-Shannon divergence; Kullback-Leibler divergence; Pearson distribution; RSSI; optical wireless communications; COMMUNICATION-SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.3390/technologies9020026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The performance of a free-space optical (FSO) communications link suffers from the deleterious effects of weather conditions and atmospheric turbulence. In order to better estimate the reliability and availability of an FSO link, a suitable distribution needs to be employed. The accuracy of this model depends strongly on the atmospheric turbulence strength which causes the scintillation effect. To this end, a variety of probability density functions were utilized to model the optical channel according to the strength of the refractive index structure parameter. Although many theoretical models have shown satisfactory performance, in reality they can significantly differ. This work employs an information theoretic method, namely the so-called Jensen-Shannon divergence, a symmetrization of the Kullback-Leibler divergence, to measure the similarity between different probability distributions. In doing so, a large experimental dataset of received signal strength measurements from a real FSO link is utilized. Additionally, the Pearson family of continuous probability distributions is also employed to determine the best fit according to the mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the modeled data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Andrews L. C., 2001, LASER BEAM SCINTILLA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, IMS LECT NOTES MONOG
  • [3] Awrejcewicz J, 2011, NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING PROCESSES, P1, DOI 10.5772/1828
  • [4] Barrios R., 2012, WIRELESS OPTICAL COM
  • [5] Cover TM., 2005, ELEMENTS INFORM THEO, V2nd, DOI 10.1002/047174882X
  • [6] Fuglede B, 2004, 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, P31
  • [7] Performance analysis of FSO communications under LOS blockage
    Garrido-Balsells, Jose M.
    Javier Lopez-Martinez, F.
    Castillo-Vazquez, Miguel
    Jurado-Navas, Antonio
    Puerta-Notario, Antonio
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 25 (21): : 25278 - 25294
  • [8] Hajek L., 2015, P SPIE
  • [9] Prediction of Received Optical Power for Switching Hybrid FSO/RF System
    Haluska, Renat
    Sul'aj, Peyer
    Ovsenik, L'ubos
    Marchevsky, Stanislav
    Papaj, Jan
    Dobos, L'ubomir
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 14
  • [10] Kaushal H, 2017, OPT NETW, P41, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-3691-7_2