Revisiting the modeling of wind turbine power curves using neural networks and fuzzy models: an application-oriented evaluation

被引:2
作者
Barreto, Guilherme A. [1 ]
Brasil, Igor S. [2 ]
Souza, Luis Gustavo M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Ctr Technol, Dept Teleinformat Engn, Campus Pici, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Piaui, Ctr Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Teresina, Piaui, Brazil
来源
ENERGY SYSTEMS-OPTIMIZATION MODELING SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS | 2022年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Nonlinear regression; Fuzzy models; Neural models; Power curve estimation; Wind turbines; GAUSSIAN-PROCESSES; IDENTIFICATION; DISTANCE; SYSTEMS; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1007/s12667-021-00449-5
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Wind turbine power curve (WTPC) modeling from measured data is essential to predict the power generation from wind farms. Polynomial regression is commonly the first choice for this purpose, but there are other more powerful alternatives based on neural networks and fuzzy algorithms, for instance. Despite the existence of previous applications of such learning algorithms to WTPC modeling, a critical analysis of their performances has not yet been carried out while taking into into account both quantitative and quantitative aspects. Quantitative figures of merit include the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and R-squared (R-2), whereas qualitative approaches are often based on simple visual inspection. In this context, this work reports the results of a comprehensive performance comparison involving the estimation of WTPC. The study comprises three neural-network-based models, that is, multilayer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF), and extreme learning machine (ELM); as well two fuzzy-logic-based models, that is, Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) and adaptive network fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Using two real-world challenging data sets, it is possible to evaluate how the models perform concerning the accuracy of the curve fitting, sensitivity to parameter initialization, and occurrence of pathological solutions. Relevant issues, such as hyperparameter settings and data normalization are also addressed. The obtained results confirm the fact that the model selection should not rely only on quantitative performance indices. Thus, it is reasonable to state that the design of general-purpose modeling tools such as the ones evaluated in this work should incorporate domain-specific knowledge to provide good accuracy associated with reliable results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 1010
页数:28
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Wind turbine power curve estimation based on earth mover distance and artificial neural networks [J].
Bai, Li ;
Crisostomi, Emanuele ;
Raugi, Marco ;
Tucci, Mauro .
IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2019, 13 (15) :2939-2946
[2]  
Barreto GA, 2015, NEURAL PROCESS LETT, V42, P119, DOI 10.1007/s11063-014-9393-2
[3]   Review of power curve modelling for wind turbines [J].
Carrillo, C. ;
Obando Montano, A. F. ;
Cidras, J. ;
Diaz-Dorado, E. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :572-581
[4]  
Chiu SL., 1994, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V2, P267, DOI [10.3233/IFS-1994-2306, DOI 10.3233/IFS-1994-2306]
[5]   Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output [J].
Clifton, A. ;
Kilcher, L. ;
Lundquist, J. K. ;
Fleming, P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (02)
[6]   Neural network operators: Constructive interpolation of multivariate functions [J].
Costarelli, Danilo .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2015, 67 :28-36
[7]   An empirical model of power curve of a wind turbine [J].
Das A.K. .
Energy Systems, 2014, 5 (03) :507-518
[8]   Wind farm monitoring using Mahalanobis distance and fuzzy clustering [J].
de la Hermosa Gonzalez-Carrato, Raul Ruiz .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 123 :526-540
[9]  
Delfos, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
[10]  
Eaton JohnW., 2016, GNU OCTAVE VERSION 4