A geospatial approach to assessing soil erosion in a watershed by integrating socio-economic determinants and the RUSLE model

被引:57
作者
Bhandari, Krishna P. [1 ]
Aryal, Jagannath [2 ]
Darnsawasdi, Rotchanatch [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Environm Management, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Land & Food, Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
Socio-economic variables (or determinants); Soil conservation; Multiple regression analysis; RUSLE; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; GIS FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION; RISK; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-014-1321-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The amount, degree of severity, and risk of soil erosion in managed landscapes mainly depend on human activities such as vegetation removal, grazing, urbanisation, poor agricultural management, and planned burning. However, the underlying mechanisms that ultimately drive the activities causing soil erosion for a particular location are less obvious. We address this issue by integrating stakeholder perceptions of socio-economic determinants of soil erosion and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) for the Phewa watershed, Pokhara, Nepal. A RUSLE model was applied to estimate the soil erosion status of the watershed based on socioeconomic-topographical factors. The output of the model indicated that the current annual rate of soil erosion in the Phewa watershed varies from 0 to 206.8 t ha(-1) year(-1), with a mean annual soil loss rate of 14.7 t ha(-1) year(-1). We used a structured questionnaire to collect socio-economic variables related to soil erosion in the watershed. Bivariate correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed ten socio-economic variables that were predictors of soil erosion. The analysis generated five predictive models: the first (R-2 = 0.65), second (R-2 = 0.71), third (R-2 = 0.79), and fourth model (R-2 = 0.85) significantly (p < 0.01) explained the variability of soil erosion rate across the watershed, while the fifth (full) model significantly (p < 0.01) explained 89 % of the variability of soil erosion rate (R-2 = 0.89). Our study identified socio-economic variables such as household size, farm labour availability, level of education, conservation cost, training, membership of organisation committees, distance, farm size, migration, and farm income as predictor variables of soil erosion.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 342
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, DOI [10.1007/BF03000363, DOI 10.1007/BF03000363]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, PRINCIPLES GEOGRAPHI
  • [3] Bartsch KP, 2002, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V57, P29
  • [4] GIS-based rapid assessment of erosion risk in a small catchment in the wet/dry tropics of Australia
    Boggs, G
    Devonport, C
    Evans, K
    Puig, P
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 12 (05) : 417 - 434
  • [5] Cerri C.E. P., 2001, Mapp. Sci. Remote Sens, V38, P157, DOI [10.1080/07493878.2001.10642173, DOI 10.1080/07493878.2001.10642173]
  • [6] El-Swaify S.A., 1982, Soil erosion by water in the tropics
  • [7] ERVIN CA, 1982, LAND ECON, V58, P277, DOI 10.2307/3145937
  • [8] Fleming WM, 1978, PHEWA TAL WATERSHED
  • [9] Fort M, 1982, CONT GEOSCIENCES RES, V2
  • [10] Fort M, 1987, SPORADIC MORPHOGENES