Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study

被引:183
作者
Thomas, R [1 ]
George, R
Parikh, R
Muliyil, J
Jacob, A
机构
[1] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Hyderabad 500034, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Schell Eye Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Community Hlth, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjo.87.4.450
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim: To report progression of primary angle closure suspects (PACS) to primary angle closure (PAC) at the 5 year follow up of a population based sample. Methods: 82 of 118 PACS who could be contacted and 110 randomly selected normals from a population based survey in 1995 were invited for a follow up examination in 2000. Progression to PAC was based on the development of raised IOP or synechiae in a PACS. Results: 50 of the 82 PACS contacted were examined. 11 (22%; 95% CI 9.8 to 34.2) developed PAC (seven synechial and four appositional); all were bilateral PACS. Two of 50 people previously diagnosed as PACS were reclassified as normal. One person among the 110 normals progressed to PAC. The relative risk of progression among PACS was 24 (95% CI 3.2 to 182.4). There was no significant difference in axial length, anterior chamber depth, or lens thickness between those who progressed and those who did not. None of the patients developed optic disc or field damage attributable to angle closure. One angle closure suspect was diagnosed to have normotensive glaucoma. Conclusion: In this population based study of PACS the 5 year incidence of PAC was 22%; none developed functional damage. Bilateral PACS was a clinical risk factor for progression.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 454
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ALSBIRK PH, 1992, INT OPHTHALMOL, V16, P265
[2]   Increase in iris-lens contact after laser iridotomy for pupillary block angle closure [J].
Caronia, RM ;
Liebmann, JM ;
Stegman, Z ;
Sokol, J ;
Ritch, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 122 (01) :53-57
[3]   ISSUES IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND POPULATION-BASED SCREENING OF PRIMARY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA [J].
CONGDON, N ;
WANG, F ;
TIELSCH, JM .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 36 (06) :411-423
[4]   Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India - The Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study [J].
Dandona, L ;
Dandona, R ;
Mandal, P ;
Srinivas, M ;
John, RK ;
McCarty, CA ;
Rao, GN .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (09) :1710-1716
[5]   The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys [J].
Foster, PJ ;
Buhrmann, R ;
Quigley, HA ;
Johnson, GJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :238-242
[6]   Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme [J].
Foster, PJ ;
Devereux, JG ;
Alsbirk, PH ;
Lee, PS ;
Uranchimeg, D ;
Machin, D ;
Johnson, GJ ;
Baasanhu, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (02) :186-192
[7]   Who needs an iridotomy? [J].
Friedman, DS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (09) :1019-1021
[8]   Lens extraction for uncontrolled angle-closure glaucoma: Long-term follow-up [J].
Gunning, FP ;
Greve, EL .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 24 (10) :1347-1356
[9]  
GUNNING FP, 1991, INT OPHTHALMOL, V15, P237
[10]  
Jacob Aby, 1998, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, V46, P81