A paradox perspective on the interactive effects of visionary and empowering leadership

被引:88
作者
Kearney, Eric [1 ]
Shemla, Meir [2 ]
van Knippenberg, Daan [3 ]
Scholz, Florian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Drexel Univ, LeBow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Visionary leadership; Empowering leadership; Goal clarity; Performance; Paradox; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; SUBJECTIVE MEASURES; ROLE AMBIGUITY; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; WORK; DESIGN; ORGANIZATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In a multi-source, lagged design field study of 197 leader-follower dyads, we test a model that predicts positive interactive effects of visionary and empowering leadership on follower performance. Based on the paradox perspective, we argue that visionary and empowering leadership are synergistic in that their combination enables leaders to address a key paradox inherent to leader behavior identified by Waldman and Bowen (2016): Maintaining control while simultaneously letting go of control. We argue that visionary leadership addresses the former and empowering leadership addresses the latter pole of this pair of opposites. Hence, in line with paradox thinking, we posit that leaders will engender more positive effects on follower performance when they enact visionary and empowering leadership behaviors simultaneously and adopt a "both-and" approach, rather than focus on one of these behaviors without the other. Our results support our hypothesized interactive effect of visionary and empowering leadership on goal clarity, as well as a conditional indirect effect such that goal clarity mediates the interactive effect of visionary and empowering leadership on individual follower performance.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[81]   LEARNING TO BE A PARADOX-SAVVY LEADER [J].
Waldman, David A. ;
Bowen, David E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (03) :316-327
[82]   On the validity of subjective measures of company performance [J].
Wall, TD ;
Michie, J ;
Patterson, M ;
Wood, SJ ;
Sheehan, M ;
Clegg, CW ;
West, M .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (01) :95-118
[83]  
Yukl G. A., 2010, LEADERSHIP ORG
[84]   Effective Leadership Behavior: What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention [J].
Yukl, Gary .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (04) :66-85
[85]  
Yun S., 2006, J MANAGE PSYCHOL, V21, P374, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02683940610663141, 10.1108/02683940610663141]
[86]   Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism [J].
Zhang, Xiaomeng ;
Zhou, Jing .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2014, 124 (02) :150-164
[87]   LINKING EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT, INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, AND CREATIVE PROCESS ENGAGEMENT [J].
Zhang, Xiaomeng ;
Bartol, Kathryn M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 53 (01) :107-128
[88]   PARADOXICAL LEADER BEHAVIORS IN PEOPLE MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES [J].
Zhang, Yan ;
Waldman, David A. ;
Han, Yu-Lan ;
Li, Xiao-Bei .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (02) :538-566