SCULPTURE PARKS OF THE XX CENTURY LAST THIRD - THE XXI CENTURY BEGINNING: TYPOLOGY EXPERIENCE

被引:0
作者
Steklova, Irina A. [1 ,2 ]
Raguzhina, Olesya, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Penza State Univ Architectural & Construct, Penza, Russia
[2] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia
来源
VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-KULTUROLOGIYA I ISKUSSTVOVEDENIE-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES AND ART HISTORY | 2021年 / 41卷
关键词
sculpture parks; typology; synthesis of landscape and monumental-decorative arts; artistic diversity;
D O I
10.17223/2220836/41/7
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to present sculpture parks at the modern stage of development, from the last third of the 20th century to our day. The relevance of this purpose is due to the relevance of these parks, which meets, firstly, on the challenges of culture, reproducing itself in the synthesis of landscape and monumental-decorative arts; secondly, on the demands of the population in artistically interpreted natural spaces; thirdly, on the life-building claims of modern art, which is looking for optimal ways of self-presentation. The representation of the sculpture parks is implied their systematization, which, in the course of the factual and visual material analysis, exhibits the most typical trends of formal and informative diversity and takes the form of a typology. To start building a typology, it was necessary to draw up a rather broad and spacious representative sample of objects and to select reference criteria in the trends of the manifold. Thus, a representative sample was made up of 90 Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North and South America brightest objects, and following criteria were put forward: environmental involvement, authorship, the nature of specific forms and links between them. Typology showed that approximately two thirds of the sculpture parks are a product of the natural environment and one third of the architectural environment. In the natural environment, in authentic natural spaces, these are co-author full (independent and contextual) and special (by place, material, style, theme) formats, as well as mono-author formats. In an architectural environment, in integrated or interpreted natural spaces, these are, first of all, city formats that can be both co-authors and mono-authors: destinations, stops, transit zones. The implementation of the typology was facilitated by the attraction of a new material for the national art history. In the scientific circulation were introduced information about objects that were not mentioned before and unknown artists. Accounting for this information, along with known realities, allowed us to reach a higher understanding level of sculpture parks as a modern hypostasis of artistic synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 94
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MINNEAPOLIS SCULPTUR
  • [2] [Anonymous], SKULPTUREN PARK KOLN
  • [3] [Anonymous], JARDIN TINO ROSSI
  • [4] [Anonymous], TOUT GUARRY SCULPTUR
  • [5] Baker A., 2006, SOCRATES SCULPTURE P
  • [6] Barsukova N.I, 2007, VESTNIK OGU, V76, P88
  • [7] Beardsley J., 1996, LANDSCAPE MODERN SCU
  • [8] Blazquez J., 2006, SCULPTURE PARKS EURO
  • [9] Chernikova V.E, 2018, MODIFICATION CULTURA, V2, DOI [10.24158/ fik.2018.2.1, DOI 10.24158/FIK.2018.2.1]
  • [10] Dempsey Amy., 2006, DESTINATION ART