Reducing the Time from Surgery to Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: An Institutional Quality Improvement Project

被引:42
作者
Divi, Vasu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Michelle M. [1 ]
Hara, Wendy [3 ]
Shah, Deepa [2 ]
Narvasa, Kristina [2 ]
Smith, Andrea Segura [2 ]
Kelley, Jennifer [2 ]
Rosenthal, Eben L. [1 ,2 ]
Porter, Julie [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Hlth Care, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford Canc Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
quality improvement; head and neck surgery; adjuvant therapy; process measures; benchmarks; care coordination; HEAD; RADIOTHERAPY; INITIATION;
D O I
10.1177/0194599818768254
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend an interval between surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy of less than 6 weeks, but only 44% of patients meet this metric nationally. We sought to identify key components of an improvement process focused on starting adjuvant radiation therapy within 6 weeks of surgery. Methods This project used an A3 model to improve a defined process measure. We studied a consecutive sample of 56 patients with oral cavity carcinoma who were treated at our institution with upfront surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Twelve proposed interventions tested during the study period focused on 3 key drivers of delays: delayed dental evaluation and teeth extraction, delayed radiation oncology consults, and inadequate patient engagement. The primary outcome measure was the number of days from surgery to the start of radiation therapy. Results Prior to the intervention, 62% of patients received adjuvant radiation within 6 weeks of surgery. Following the intervention, 73% of patients achieved this metric. The percentage of patients with avoidable delays decreased from 24% to 9%. The percentage of patients with unavoidable delays was relatively constant before and after the intervention (15% and 18%, respectively). Discussion Defining disease-specific metrics is critical to improving care in our head and neck cancer patient population. We demonstrate several key components to develop and improve self-defined metrics. Implications for Practice As we transition to a system of value-based care, structured quality improvement projects can have a measurable impact on cancer patient process measures.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer [J].
Ang, KK ;
Trotti, A ;
Brown, BW ;
Garden, AS ;
Foote, RL ;
Morrison, WH ;
Geara, FB ;
Klotch, DW ;
Goepfert, H ;
Peters, LJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03) :571-578
[2]  
[Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACTICE G
[3]   Cesium Titanium(IV) Bromide Thin Films Based Stable Lead-free Perovskite Solar Cells [J].
Chen, Min ;
Ju, Ming-Gang ;
Carl, Alexander D. ;
Zong, Yingxia ;
Grimm, Ronald L. ;
Gu, Jiajun ;
Zeng, Xiao Cheng ;
Zhou, Yuanyuan ;
Padture, Nitin P. .
JOULE, 2018, 2 (03) :558-570
[4]   Effect of time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer [J].
Graboyes, Evan M. ;
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth ;
Ellis, Mark A. ;
Sharma, Anand K. ;
Wahlquist, Amy E. ;
Lentsch, Eric J. ;
Nussenbaum, Brian ;
Day, Terry A. .
CANCER, 2017, 123 (24) :4841-4850
[5]   Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Time to Initiation of Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer [J].
Graboyes, Evan M. ;
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth ;
Sharma, Anand K. ;
Lentsch, Eric J. ;
Day, Terry A. .
CANCER, 2017, 123 (14) :2651-2660
[6]   Does delay in starting treatment affect the outcomes of radiotherapy? A systematic review [J].
Huang, J ;
Barbera, L ;
Brouwers, M ;
Browman, G ;
Mackillop, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) :555-563
[7]   Statistical Analysis of Surgical Site Infection After Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery [J].
Kamizono, Kenichi ;
Sakuraba, Minoru ;
Nagamatsu, Shogo ;
Miyamoto, Shimpei ;
Hayashi, Ryuichi .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) :1700-1705
[8]   MH Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature [J].
Goodman, Daisy ;
Ogrinc, Greg ;
Davies, Louise ;
Baker, G. Ross ;
Barnsteiner, Jane ;
Foster, Tina C. ;
Gali, Kari ;
Hilden, Joanne ;
Horwitz, Leora ;
Kaplan, Heather C. ;
Leis, Jerome ;
Matulis, John C. ;
Michie, Susan ;
Miltner, Rebecca ;
Neily, Julia ;
Nelson, William A. ;
Niedner, Matthew ;
Oliver, Brant ;
Rutman, Lori ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Thor, Johan .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (12)
[9]  
Shook J., 2008, MANAGING LEARN USING
[10]   Analysis of outcome and complications in 400 cases of microvascular head and neck reconstruction [J].
Suh, JD ;
Sercarz, JA ;
Abemayor, E ;
Calcaterra, TC ;
Rawnsley, JD ;
Alam, D ;
Blackwell, KE .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (08) :962-966