Maternal and foetal physiological response of sacral surface electrical stimulation during pregnancy: A preliminary study

被引:1
|
作者
Katsura, Daisuke [1 ]
Tsuji, Shunichiro [1 ]
Hayashi, Kaori [1 ]
Tokoro, Shinsuke [1 ]
Hoshiyama, Takako [1 ]
Kita, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Murakami, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ Med Sci Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
关键词
foetus; pregnant women; sacral surface electrical stimulation; PUDENDAL NERVE-STIMULATION; NEUROMODULATION; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1113/EP090187
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
New Findings What is the central question of this study? The physiological response to sacral neuromodulation by pregnant women and foetuses has not been previously explored. What is the main finding and its importance? Sacral surface electrical stimulation had no adverse effect on pregnant women and foetuses at least 36 weeks of gestation. It may cause uterine relaxation resulting from decreased uterine artery pulsatility index and increased umbilical venous flow volume and thereby improve utero-placental perfusion and improve lower back pain. This study aimed to examine the impact of sacral surface electrical stimulation on maternal and foetal physiology during pregnancy. Ten pregnant women at 36 weeks of gestation without multiple gestations, foetuses with malformations, foetal growth restriction, hypertensive disorders, polyhydramnios, or oligohydramnios were enrolled. This prospective study monitored maternal and foetal physiological responses before and after sacral surface electrical stimulation for single pregnancies. Sacral surface electrical stimulation was performed once per patient. Each parameter was measured directly before and then immediately after stimulation. Follow-up measurements were conducted at 12 h, 1 day, 2 days and 7 days after stimulation. Variables of interest were compared before and after the stimulation. Regarding the foetal Doppler measurements, significant differences were not found in the umbilical and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index. However, foetuses showed a significant increase in the umbilical venous flow volume. The uterine contraction frequency and the maternal uterine artery pulsatility index significantly decreased. Pregnancy outcomes, and rates of caesarean section, foetal distress, and neonatal asphyxia were not confirmed. In conclusion, sacral surface electrical stimulation had no adverse effects on pregnant women or foetuses at 36 weeks of gestation and might improve utero-placental perfusion and lower back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 514
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging of morphological and functional changes of the uterus induced by sacral surface electrical stimulation
    Ogura, T
    Murakami, T
    Ozawa, Y
    Seki, K
    Handa, Y
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2006, 208 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [2] Temporary Sacral Nerve Stimulation Alters Rectal Sensory Function: A Physiological Study
    Abdel-Halim, Mostafa R. E.
    Crosbie, James
    Engledow, Alec
    Windsor, Alastair
    Cohen, Charles R. G.
    Emmanuel, Anton V.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (09) : 1134 - 1140
  • [3] Hepatitis E during pregnancy: Maternal and foetal case-fatality rates and adverse outcomes-A systematic review
    Berglov, Anne
    Hallager, Sofie
    Weis, Nina
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2019, 26 (11) : 1240 - 1248
  • [4] Maternal-foetal attachment during early pregnancy in Taiwanese women pregnant by in vitro fertilization
    Kuo, Pi-Chao
    Bowers, Beverly
    Chen, Yueh-Chih
    Chen, Chung-Hey
    Tzeng, Ya-Ling
    Lee, Maw-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2013, 69 (11) : 2502 - 2513
  • [5] Gastric Electrical Stimulation and Sacral Electrical Stimulation: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Dual-Device Treatment
    Agrawal, Anubhav
    Francis, Sean Lamar
    Deveneau, Nicolette Elizabeth
    Jain, Shaily
    Abrasley, Christopher
    McNeese, Jason Trippe
    Kothari, Shivangi T.
    Lahr, Christopher J.
    Abell, Thomas L.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (01) : 176 - 180
  • [6] Gastric Electrical Stimulation and Sacral Electrical Stimulation: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Dual-Device Treatment
    Anubhav Agrawal
    Sean Lamar Francis
    Nicolette Elizabeth Deveneau
    Shaily Jain
    Christopher Abrasley
    Jason Trippe McNeese
    Shivangi T. Kothari
    Christopher J. Lahr
    Thomas L. Abell
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2016, 61 : 176 - 180
  • [7] Maternal passive smoking during pregnancy and foetal developmental toxicity. Part 2: histological changes
    Nelson, E
    Goubet-Wiemers, C
    Guo, YJ
    Jodscheit, K
    HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 18 (04): : 257 - 264
  • [8] A STUDY OF MATERNAL DIETARY INTAKE DURING PREGNANCY IN RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA
    Almurshed, Khalid S.
    Bani, Ibrahim A.
    Al-Kanhal, Mohammed A.
    Al-Amri, Mohammed A.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [9] Maternal outcomes of intimate partner violence during pregnancy: study in Iran
    Hassan, M.
    Kashanian, M.
    Hassan, M.
    Roohi, M.
    Yousefi, H.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 128 (05) : 410 - 415
  • [10] Colonic electrical stimulation for the treatment of slow-transit constipation: a preliminary pilot study
    Martellucci, Jacopo
    Valeri, Andrea
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (02): : 691 - 697