A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately?

被引:114
作者
Rawson, T. M. [1 ]
Moore, L. S. P. [1 ]
Hernandez, B. [2 ]
Charani, E. [1 ]
Castro-Sanchez, E. [1 ]
Herrero, P. [2 ]
Hayhoe, B. [3 ]
Hope, W. [4 ]
Georgiou, P. [2 ]
Holmes, A. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll, NIH, Res Hlth Protect Res Unit Healthcare Associated I, Hammersmith Campus,Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London, England
[3] Imperial Coll, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Dept Mol & Clin Pharmacol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Antimicrobial resistance; Antimicrobial stewardship; Decision algorithms; Electronic support; ACUTE RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS; CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; PRIMARY-CARE; ANTIBIOTIC USE; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; APPROVAL SYSTEM; IMPROVE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for antimicrobial management can support clinicians to optimize antimicrobial therapy. We reviewed all original literature (qualitative and quantitative) to understand the current scope of CDSS for antimicrobial management and analyse existing methods used to evaluate and report such systems. Method: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Medline, EMBASE, HMIC Health and Management and Global Health databases were searched from 1 January 1980 to 31 October 2015. All primary research studies describing CDSS for antimicrobial management in adults in primary or secondary care were included. For qualitative studies, thematic synthesis was performed. Quality was assessed using Integrated quality Criteria for the Review Of Multiple Study designs (ICROMS) criteria. CDSS reporting was assessed against a reporting framework for behaviour change intervention implementation. Results: Fifty-eight original articles were included describing 38 independent CDSS. The majority of systems target antimicrobial prescribing (29/38;76%), are platforms integrated with electronic medical records (28/38;74%), and have a rules-based infrastructure providing decision support (29/38;76%). On evaluation against the intervention reporting framework, CDSS studies fail to report consideration of the non-expert, end-user workflow. They have narrow focus, such as antimicrobial selection, and use proxy outcome measures. Engagement with CDSS by clinicians was poor. Conclusion: Greater consideration of the factors that drive non-expert decision making must be considered when designing CDSS interventions. Future work must aim to expand CDSS beyond simply selecting appropriate antimicrobials with clear and systematic reporting frameworks for CDSS interventions developed to address current gaps identified in the reporting of evidence. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 532
页数:9
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Using probabilistic and decision-theoretic methods in treatment and prognosis modeling
    Andreassen, S
    Riekehr, C
    Kristensen, B
    Schonheyder, HC
    Leibovici, L
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 1999, 15 (02) : 121 - 134
  • [2] GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
    Balshem, Howard
    Helfand, Mark
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Kunz, Regina
    Brozek, Jan
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    Norris, Susan
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [3] The effectiveness of information technology to improve antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baysari, Melissa T.
    Lehnbom, Elin C.
    Li, Ling
    Hargreaves, Andrew
    Day, Richard O.
    Westbrook, Johanna I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 92 : 15 - 34
  • [4] Enhancing clinical decision support to improve appropriate antimicrobial use
    Beaulieu, James
    Fortin, Rachel
    Palmisciano, Louis
    Elsaid, Khaled
    Collins, Christine
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2013, 70 (13) : 1103 - +
  • [5] Berner E.S., 2009, CLIN DECISION SUPPOR
  • [6] An electronic chart prompt to decrease proprietary antibiotic prescription to self-pay patients
    Bernstein, SL
    Whitaker, D
    Winograd, J
    Brennan, JA
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (03) : 225 - 231
  • [7] Impact of an assisted reassessment of antibiotic therapies on the quality of prescriptions in an intensive care unit
    Bornard, L.
    Dellamonica, J.
    Hyvernat, H.
    Girard-Pipau, F.
    Molinari, N.
    Sotto, A.
    Roger, P. -M.
    Bernardin, G.
    Pulcini, C.
    [J]. MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2011, 41 (09): : 480 - 485
  • [8] Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280]
  • [9] Electronic antibiotic stewardship - reduced consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics using a computerized antimicrobial approval system in a hospital setting
    Buising, K. L.
    Thursky, K. A.
    Robertson, M. B.
    Black, J. F.
    Street, A. C.
    Richards, M. J.
    Brown, G. V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 62 (03) : 608 - 616
  • [10] Improving antibiotic prescribing for adults with community acquired pneumonia: Does a computerised decision support system achieve more than academic detailing alone? a time series analysis
    Buising, Kirsty L.
    Thursky, Karin A.
    Black, James F.
    MacGregor, Lachlan
    Street, Alan C.
    Kennedy, Marcus P.
    Brown, Graham V.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)