Stakeholder perceptions of policy implementation for Indigenous health and cultural safety: A study of Australia's 'Closing the Gap' policies

被引:15
作者
Fisher, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Mackean, Tamara [2 ,3 ]
George, Emma [1 ]
Friel, Sharon [4 ]
Baum, Fran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Southgate Inst Hlth Soc & Equ, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Hlth & Med Res Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance RegNet, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
closing the gap; cultural safety; Indigenous health; public policy; social determinants of Indigenous health; CARE SERVICES;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8500.12482
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Indigenous peoples in Australia and similar colonised countries are subject to racism and systemic socioeconomic disadvantages, resulting in worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous counterparts. Such inequities persist despite governments' attempts to reduce them. Since 2008, Australian governments have committed to a national 'Closing the Gap' (CTG) to reduce inequities in health, education, and employment outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians, but with limited success. We applied policy theory and a cultural safety framework developed for the research to analyse stakeholder perceptions of CTG policy implementation between 2008 and 2019. We identified policy-shaping ideas and policy incoherence in the environment surrounding CTG policy that obstructed culturally safe policy. Top-down, prescriptive modes of implementation were also a barrier. However, Indigenous-led policy partnerships and community-controlled services in the health sector have met principles of cultural safety. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses points to ways in which implementation of CTG policies can be improved to achieve cultural safety and reduce Indigenous health inequities. These results may hold lessons for similar countries such as the United States, New Zealand, and Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 260
页数:22
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, 2015, SOC JUST NAT TITL RE
  • [2] Anderson I., 2007, Beyond Bandaids: Exploring the underlying social determinants of Aboriginal health: Papers from the social determinants of Aboriginal Health workshop, Adelaide, July 2004
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Policy Coherence for Development: Promoting Institutional Good Practice, The Development Dimension
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, United nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples
  • [5] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2020, CORRECTIVE SERVICES
  • [6] Australian Government, 2020, Closing the Gap Prime Minister's Report 2020
  • [7] Australian Indigenous Doctors' Association (AIDA) and Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation UNSW, 2010, HLTH IMPACT ASSESSME
  • [8] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2020, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework 2020 summary report
  • [9] Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary and multimethods research programme on policies on the social determinants of health inequity in Australia
    Baum, Fran
    Friel, Sharon
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [10] The potential for multi-disciplinary primary health care services to take action on the social determinants of health: actions and constraints
    Baum, Frances E.
    Legge, David G.
    Freeman, Toby
    Lawless, Angela
    Labonte, Ronald
    Jolley, Gwyneth M.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13