Influence of Knee Positions on T2, T*2, and dGEMRIC Mapping in Porcine Knee Cartilage

被引:14
|
作者
Shiomi, Toshiyuki [2 ]
Nishii, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Myoui, Akira [2 ,3 ]
Yoshikawa, Hideki [2 ]
Sugano, Nobuhiko [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Orthopaed Med Engn, Sch Med, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ Hosp, Med Ctr Translat Res, Osaka 553, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
MRI; knee cartilage; T-2; T*(2); dGEMRIC; BOVINE ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; IN-VIVO; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; RELAXATION-TIME; HYALINE CARTILAGE; MU-MRI; T; MICROSCOPY; COLLAGEN; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.22469
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We examined the influence of flexed knee positions on cartilage MR assessments. Sagittal T-2, T*(2), and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) maps of the femoral cartilage were obtained in eight 6-month-old porcine femorotibial joints in the extended knee position (position A: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft in parallel with the amplitude of static field), flexed knee position (position B: flexion 40 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field), and oblique-placed knee-extended position (position C: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field). Comparison of the MR parameters between positions A and C showed isolated influence of the magic-angle effect, and comparison between positions A and B showed effects of knee flexion. Proteoglycan and hydroxyproline content in cartilage specimen at each region of interest had no significant correlation with T-2, T*(2), and dGEMRIC values. At the central zone, located on a weight-bearing area and parallel to the amplitude of static field, T-2/T*(2)/dGEMRIC values increased by 6.8/11/0.8% at position C and by 24/44/31% at position B compared with position A. There was a significant increase in T-2 and T*(2) values at position B compared with those at position A. The substantial changes in T-2, T*(2), and dGEMRIC were shown in response to knee flexion, presumably due to the compounding influence of the magic-angle effect and change in the intra-articular biomechanical condition. Magn Reson Med 64:707-714, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 714
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reproducibility of Quantitative Double-Echo Steady-State T2 Mapping of Knee Cartilage
    Williams, Ashley A.
    Asay, Jessica L.
    Asare, Daniella
    Desai, Arjun D.
    Gold, Garry E.
    Hargreaves, Brian A.
    Chaudhari, Akshay S.
    Chu, Constance R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (02) : 784 - 795
  • [42] Anterior cruciate ligament injury and age affect knee cartilage T2 but not thickness
    Herger, Simon
    Wirth, Wolfgang
    Eckstein, Felix
    Nuesch, Corina
    Egloff, Christian
    Mu, Annegret
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 (11) : 1492 - 1502
  • [43] Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint: Value of Adding a T2 Mapping Sequence to a Routine MR Imaging Protocol
    Kijowski, Richard
    Blankenbaker, Donna G.
    del Rio, Alejandro Munoz
    Baer, Geoffrey S.
    Graf, Ben K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 503 - 513
  • [44] Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage:: topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties
    Kurkijärvi, JE
    Nissi, MJ
    Kiviranta, I
    Jurvelin, JS
    Nieminen, MT
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [45] Cartilage quality in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of T2*mapping, native T1 mapping, dGEMRIC, ΔR1 and value of pre-contrast imaging
    Buchbender, Christian
    Scherer, Axel
    Kroepil, Patric
    Koerbl, Birthe
    Quentin, Michael
    Reichelt, Dorothea Ch.
    Lanzman, Rotem S.
    Mathys, Christian
    Blondin, Dirk
    Bittersohl, Bernd
    Zilkens, Christoph
    Hofer, Matthias
    Wittsack, Hans-Joerg
    Schneider, Matthias
    Antoch, Gerald
    Ostendorf, Benedikt
    Miese, Falk
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (06) : 685 - 692
  • [46] Variability of CubeQuant T1ρ, quantitative DESS T2, and cones sodium MRI in knee cartilage
    Jordan, C. D.
    McWalter, E. J.
    Monu, U. D.
    Watkins, R. D.
    Chen, W.
    Bangerter, N. K.
    Hargreaves, B. A.
    Gold, G. E.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 (10) : 1559 - 1567
  • [47] Knee dGEMRIC at 7 T: comparison against 1.5 T and evaluation of T1-mapping methods
    Peterson, Pernilla
    Tiderius, Carl Johan
    Olsson, Emma
    Lundin, Bjorn
    Olsson, Lars E.
    Svensson, Jonas
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [48] Biexponential T2 relaxation estimation of human knee cartilage in vivo at 3T
    Sharafi, Azadeh
    Chang, Gregory
    Regatte, Ravinder R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (03) : 809 - 819
  • [49] Topographical variation of T2 relaxation time in the young adult knee cartilage at 1.5 T
    Hannila, I.
    Raina, S. Susanna
    Tervonen, O.
    Ojala, R.
    Nieminen, M. T.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (12) : 1570 - 1575
  • [50] In vitro mapping of 1H ultrashort T2* and T2 of porcine menisci
    Kirsch, S.
    Kreinest, M.
    Reisig, G.
    Schwarz, M. L. R.
    Stroebel, P.
    Schad, L. R.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 26 (09) : 1167 - 1175