THE PROBLEM OF RELEVANCE AND THE FUTURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION

被引:6
作者
Carroll, Thomas D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xing Wei Coll, 1635 Cheng Nan Rd, Shanghai 201300, Peoples R China
关键词
applied philosophy; higher education; metaphilosophy; philosophy of religion; relevance; religious studies;
D O I
10.1111/meta.12168
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Despite the growth in research in philosophy of religion over the past several decades, recent years have seen a number of critical studies of this subfield in an effort to redirect the methods and topics of inquiry. This article argues that in addition to problems of religious parochialism described by critics such as Wesley Wildman, the subfield is facing a problem of relevance. In responding to this problem, it suggests that philosophers of religion should do three things: first, be critically self-aware about their aims of inquiry; second, investigate concepts used by other philosophers, scientists, and religious studies scholars to identify and dispel confusion about religions; and third, following the model of applied ethics, work to clarify concepts and advance arguments of contemporary practical urgency.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 58
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Religious Philosophy after 'Religion'?
    Amesbury, Richard
    [J]. SOPHIA, 2012, 51 (02) : 293 - 297
  • [2] Anderson PS, 2010, FEM PHILOS COLLECT, P163, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6833-1_11
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Religious Philosophy as Multidisciplinary Comparative Inquiry: Envisioning a Future for the Philosophy of Religion
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, PHILOS STUDY RELIG M
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, PHILPAPERS SURVEY
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, FUTURE PHILOS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2001, PHILOS INVESTIGATION
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, CONFLICT REALLY LIES, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199812097.001.0001
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, The Pew Forum on Religion Public Life
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, PHILOS GOURMET REPOR