Does the EU stifle voluntary policy transfer? A study of the introduction of freedom of information in Portugal and Ireland

被引:5
作者
Bugdahn, Sonja
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00637.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Traditionally, policy transfer within Europe has taken place in the form of bilateral voluntary transfer within 'families of nations'. The creation of binding international regimes, in particular the adoption of binding EU policies, has increased instances of multilaterally obligated transfer in Europe. However, very little research has been carried out on the interaction between these two types of transfers. This paper starts from the assumption that a binding EU policy of ambiguous nature and/or with a limited scope of application creates policy space for additional voluntary transfers in member states. Evidence on the implementation of the 1990 Access to Environmental Information Directive in Portugal and Ireland is used to illustrate that three different modes of combining voluntary and obligated transfers may be used. There is, however, no ideal solution since the three modes (hybridization, fragmentation and sub-regimes) create different types of costs and benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 142
页数:20
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
ANDRADE IC, 2005, ACCESS JUSTICE ENV M, P121
[2]  
Annesley C., 2003, BRIT J POLIT INT REL, V5, P143
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, POLICY TRANSFER GLOB
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC ADM PUBLIC PO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, REFORMING EC SYSTEMS
[6]  
[Anonymous], FREEDOMINFO ORG GLOB
[7]  
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC POLICY, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00004918
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Governance of Global Networks in the Light of Differing Local Values
[9]  
[Anonymous], NEW DIMENSIONS EUROP
[10]   Understanding ripple effects: The cross-national adoption of policy instruments for bureaucratic accountability [J].
Bennett, CJ .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 1997, 10 (03) :213-233