Who's Posting Facebook Faux Pas? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Personality Differences

被引:94
作者
Karl, Katherine [1 ]
Peluchette, Joy [2 ,4 ]
Schlaegel, Christopher [3 ]
机构
[1] Marshall Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Lewis Coll Business, Huntington, WV 25755 USA
[2] Univ So Indiana, MIS, Dept Management, Evansville, IN 47712 USA
[3] Otto von Guericke Univ, Fac Econ & Management, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany
[4] Univ So Indiana, Coll Business, ACS, Evansville, IN 47712 USA
关键词
IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; INTERNET USE; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SELF; ONLINE; PERCEPTIONS; PREVALENCE; DIMENSIONS; PREDICTORS; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00499.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examines culture and personality differences in student reports of the likelihood that they would post various types of information on their Facebook profiles. As predicted those high on conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability proved significantly less likely to report posting problematic content (e.g., substance abuse, sexual content) on their profile. Those who scored high on Compulsive Internet Use indicated a greater likelihood to post such profile information. Consistent with our expectations, our cross-cultural analysis revealed that US students were more inclined than German students to post problematic information to their Facebook site. Implications of these results and recommendations for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 186
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Loneliness and Internet use [J].
Amichai-Hamburger, Y ;
Ben-Artzi, E .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2003, 19 (01) :71-80
[2]   Individual differences in Internet usage motives [J].
Amiel, T ;
Sargent, SL .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2004, 20 (06) :711-726
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GROWING BUSINESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], P CULT ATT TECHN COM
[5]  
[Anonymous], WALL STREET J 0404
[6]  
ARRINGTON M, 2007, CAREER ADVICE DONT S
[7]   Positive impression management and its influence on the revised NEO personality inventory: A comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Marshall, MB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2003, 15 (03) :333-339
[8]  
Beeger B, 2007, SOZIALE NETZWERKE KA
[9]  
Borman W.C., 1993, PERSONNEL SELECTION, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
[10]  
Brandenburg C., 2008, Federal Communications Law Journal, V60, P597