A randomized pilot study of the Engaging Moms Program for family drug court

被引:78
作者
Dakof, Gayle A. [1 ]
Cohen, Jeri B. [2 ]
Henderson, Craig E.
Duarte, Eliette [2 ]
Boustani, Maya [1 ]
Blackburn, Audra [1 ]
Venzer, Ellen [2 ]
Hawes, Sam [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Ctr Treatment Res Adolescent Drug Abuse, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Juvenile Div, Miami Dade Cty, FL USA
[3] Sam Houston State Univ, Huntsville, TX 77340 USA
关键词
Child maltreatment; Drug courts; Women; Addiction; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE TREATMENT; CHILD-WELFARE; WORKING ALLIANCE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; OUTCOMES; MALTREATMENT; SERVICES; ALCOHOL; MOTHERS; REUNIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
in response to the need for effective drug court interventions, the effectiveness of the Engaging Morris Program (EMP) versus Intensive Case Management Services (ICMS) on Multiple outcomes for mothers enrolled in family drug court was investigated. In this intent-to-treat study, mothers (N = 62) were randomly assigned to either usual drug court care or the Engaging Morris drug court program. Mothers were assessed at intake and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following intake. Results indicated that at 18 months post drug court enrollment, 77% of mothers assigned to EMP versus 55% of mothers assigned to ICMS had positive child welfare dispositions. There were statistically significant time effects for both intervention groups on multiple outcomes including Substance use, mental health, parenting practices, and family functioning. EMP showed equal or better improvement than ICMS on all outcomes. The results suggest that EMP in family drug court is a viable and promising intervention approach to reduce material addiction and child maltreatment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 274
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DEF DRUG COURTS KEY
[2]  
Attkisson CC, 1994, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and Service Satisfaction Scale-30
[3]  
Barth R., 1994, CHILD ABUSE PERMANEN
[4]  
Belenko S., 2001, Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update
[5]  
*BJA, 2009, DRUG COURT CLEAR PRO
[6]   The sacramento dependency drug court: Development and outcomes [J].
Boles, Sharon M. ;
Young, Nancy K. ;
Moore, Toni ;
DiPirro-Beard, Sharon .
CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2007, 12 (02) :161-171
[7]   KEY LINKAGES BETWEEN CHILD WELFARE AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT: SOCIAL FUNCTIONING IMPROVEMENTS AND CLIENT SATISFACTION IN A FAMILY DRUG TREATMENT COURT [J].
Bryan, Valerie ;
Havens, Jennifer .
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2008, 46 (01) :151-162
[8]   Suggested specifications for a standardized Addiction Severity Index database [J].
Carise, D ;
McLellan, AT ;
Cacciola, J ;
Love, M ;
Cook, T ;
Bovasso, G ;
Lam, V .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2001, 20 (03) :239-244
[9]   An experimental intervention with families of substance abusers: one-year follow-up of the focus on families project [J].
Catalano, RF ;
Gainey, RR ;
Fleming, CB ;
Haggerty, KP ;
Johnson, NO .
ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (02) :241-254
[10]   Completing substance abuse treatment in child welfare: The role of co-occurring problems and primary drug of choice [J].
Choi, Sam ;
Ryan, Joseph P. .
CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2006, 11 (04) :313-325