Effect of Different Display Types on Vection and Its Interaction With Motion Direction and Field Dependence

被引:38
作者
Keshavarz, Behrang [1 ,2 ]
Speck, Martina [3 ]
Haycock, Bruce [1 ,4 ]
Berti, Stefan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, iDAPT, Toronto Rehabil Inst, 550 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Aerosp Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
illusory self-motion; field of view; optic flow; circular vection; field dependence or field independence; cognitive style; visual stimulation; perception; PERIPHERAL-VISION; SELF-MOTION; SPATIAL-FREQUENCY; PERCEPTION; SICKNESS; STIMULUS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1177/2041669517707768
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Illusory self-motion (vection) can be generated by visual stimulation. The purpose of the present study was to compare behavioral vection measures including intensity ratings, duration, and onset time across different visual display types. Participants were exposed to a pattern of alternating black-and-white horizontal or vertical bars that moved either in vertical or horizontal direction, respectively. Stimuli were presented on four types of displays in randomized order: (a) large field of view dome projection, (b) combination of three computer screens, (c) single computer screen, (d) large field of view flat projection screen. A Computer Rod and Frame Test was used to measure field dependence, a cognitive style indicating the person's tendency to rely on external cues (i.e., field dependent) or internal cues (i.e., field independent) with respect to the perception of one's body position in space. Results revealed that all four displays successfully generated at least moderately strong vection. However, shortest vection onset, longest vection duration, and strongest vection intensity showed for the dome projection and the combination of three screens. This effect was further pronounced in field independent participants, indicating that field dependence can alter vection.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Effect of field size, head motion, and rotational velocity on roll vection and illusory self-tilt in a tumbling room [J].
Allison, RS ;
Howard, IP ;
Zacher, JE .
PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 (03) :299-306
[2]  
Bagust J., 2005, CLIN CHIROPRACTIC, V8, P134, DOI [10.1016/j.clch.2005.07.001, DOI 10.1016/J.CLCH.2005.07.001]
[3]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEPTUAL STYLE AND SIMULATOR SICKNESS [J].
BARRETT, GV ;
THORNTON, CL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 52 (04) :304-&
[4]   Cognitive Style: Time to Experiment [J].
Bendall, Robert C. A. ;
Galpin, Adam ;
Marrow, Lynne P. ;
Cassidy, Simon .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
[5]  
BERTHOZ A, 1975, EXP BRAIN RES, V23, P471
[6]   Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence [J].
Boccia, Maddalena ;
Piccardi, Laura ;
Di Marco, Mariangela ;
Pizzamiglio, Luigi ;
Guariglia, Cecilia .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 234 (10) :2799-2807
[7]  
BRANDT T, 1972, PFLUG ARCH EUR J PHY, pR98
[8]   DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF CENTRAL VERSUS PERIPHERAL VISION ON EGOCENTRIC AND EXOCENTRIC MOTION PERCEPTION [J].
BRANDT, T ;
KOENIG, E ;
DICHGANS, J .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1973, 16 (05) :476-491
[9]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[10]  
Dichgans J., 1978, Perception, P755, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46354-925, 10.1007/978-3-642-46354-925, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46354-9253F]