Sensitivity of measuring the progress in financial risk protection to survey design and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants: A case study in Rwanda

被引:12
作者
Lu, Chunling [1 ]
Liu, Kai [2 ]
Li, Lingling [3 ]
Yang, Yuhong [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Global Hlth Equ, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Labor & Human Resources, Dept Social Secur, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Stat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Rural Rwanda; Measuring catastrophic health expenditure; Measuring out-of-pocket health; expenditure; Survey design; Financial risk protection; Survey instruments; Developing countries; CATASTROPHIC HEALTH EXPENDITURE; HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS; RECALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Reliable and comparable information on households with catastrophic health expenditure (HCHE) is crucial for monitoring and evaluating our progress towards achieving universal financial risk protection. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity of measuring the progress in financial risk protection to survey design and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants. Using the Rwanda Integrated Living Conditions Survey in 2005 and 2010/2011, we derived the level and trend of the percentage of the HCHE using out-of-pocket health spending data derived from (1) a health module with a two-week recall period and six (2005)/seven (2010/2011) survey questions (Method 1) and (2) a consumption module with a four-week/ten-/12-month recall period and 11(2005)/24 (2010/2011) questions (Method 2). Using multilevel logistic regression analysis, we investigated the household socioeconomic and demographic characteristics that affected the sensitivity of estimating the HCHE to survey design. We found that Method 1 generated a significantly higher HCHE estimate (9.2%, 95% confidence interval 8.4%-10.0%) than Method2 (7.4%, 6.6%-8.1%) in 2005 and lower estimate (5.6%, 5.2%-6.1%) than Method 2 (8.2%, 7.6% 8.7%) in 2010/2011. The estimated trends of the HCHE using the two methods were not consistent between the two years. A household's size, its income quintile, having no under-five children, and educational level of its head were positively associated with the consistency of its HCHE status when using the two survey methods. Estimates of the progress in financial risk protection, especially among the most vulnerable households, are sensitive to survey design. These results are robust to various thresholds of catastrophic health spending. Future work must focus on mitigating survey effects through the development of statistical tools. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CHINA HLTH RETIREMEN, DOI DOI 10.1093/IJE/DYS203
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SYSTEM HLTH ACCOUNTS, DOI 10.1787/9789264270985-en
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance
[5]   The quality of retrospective data - An examination of long-term recall in a developing country [J].
Beckett, M ;
DeVanzo, J ;
Sastry, N ;
Panis, C ;
Peterson, C .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2001, 36 (03) :593-625
[6]   Optimal recall length in survey design [J].
Clarke, Philip M. ;
Fiebig, Denzil G. ;
Gerdtham, Ulf-G. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 27 (05) :1275-1284
[7]   Stability of differential item functioning over a single population in survey data [J].
Dodeen, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2004, 72 (03) :181-193
[8]  
Goldstein H., 2011, MULTILEVEL STAT MODE
[9]  
Grosh M., 2000, DESIGNING HOUSEHOLD
[10]  
Heijink R, 2011, VALIDITY COMP OUT OF