Understanding rancher coexistence with jaguars and pumas: a typology for conservation practice

被引:29
作者
Amit, Ronit [1 ,2 ]
Jacobson, Susan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, 110 Newins Ziegler Hall,POB 110430, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Asociac Confraternidad Guanacasteca, Programa Gente & Fauna, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
关键词
Cluster analysis; Human-wildlife coexistence; Predator-friendly practices; Taxonomy of ranchers; Theory of planned behavior; Wildlife damage prevention; HUMAN-CARNIVORE CONFLICT; WILDLIFE; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; VULNERABILITY; TOLERANCE; LIVESTOCK; EMOTIONS; MODEL; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-017-1304-1
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ranchers living near large carnivores can adopt diverse practices to prevent livestock damage. Effective management interventions to help reduce damage must address the varied needs of ranchers by segmenting audiences for more targeted programs. We developed a typology that conceptualized six types of ranchers based on the theory of planned behavior. We posited that rancher types were driven by: attitudes; social norms; perceived control; emotional disposition; risk perception; and contextual factors. To test the typology throughout Costa Rica, we conducted a structured survey of a random sample of 93 ranchers affected by jaguar and puma predation and paired them with a sample of 69 unaffected neighbors. Cluster analyses of survey results provided empirical support for a typology of four types of ranchers, two of which were predicted by the theory of planned behavior: preventive ranchers who take control to prevent felid damage; and helpless ranchers who lack control. We also identified a risk-neutral type who takes no action as they do not perceive the cats as a threat; and a cat-troubled type influenced mainly by negative emotions toward big cats. This last type supports the need to include emotional factors in theoretical frameworks when dealing with human-wildlife conflict. The typology is useful for designing improved policy and management interventions to reduce wildlife conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1374
页数:22
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research [J].
Adcock, R ;
Collier, D .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :529-546
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Ajzen I., 2006, Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire
[4]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, VPaperback, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[5]  
Amit R, 2011, ASISTENCIA TECNICA C
[6]  
Amit R, 2016, THESIS
[7]  
Amit Ronit, 2013, Human-Wildlife Interactions, V7, P77
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.875463
[9]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[10]   Utilising a farmer typology to understand farmer behaviour towards water quality management: Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Scotland [J].
Barnes, A. P. ;
Willock, J. ;
Toma, L. ;
Hall, C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (04) :477-494