Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol are similar at loss of consciousness and at awakening

被引:86
作者
Iwakiri, H
Nishihara, N
Nagata, O
Matsukawa, T
Ozaki, M [1 ]
Sessler, DI
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
[2] Univ Yamanashi, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Yamanashi, Japan
[3] Univ Louisville, Outcomes Res Inst, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[5] Univ Louisville, Dept Pharmacol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000139358.15909.EA
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Reported effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss of consciousness and recovery of consciousness vary widely. Thus, no single concentration based on a population average will prove optimal for individual patients. We therefore tested the hypothesis that individual propofol effect-site concentrations at loss and return of consciousness are similar. Propofol effect-site concentrations at loss and recovery of consciousness were estimated with a target-control infusion system in 20 adults. Propofol effect-site concentrations were gradually increased until the volunteers lost consciousness (no response to verbal stimuli); unconsciousness was maintained for 15 min, and the volunteers were then awakened. This protocol was repeated three times in each volunteer. Our major outcomes were the concentration producing unconsciousness and the relationship between the estimated effect-site concentrations at loss and recovery of consciousness. The target effectsite propofol concentration was 2.0 +/- 0.9 at loss of consciousness and 1.8 +/- 0.7 at return of consciousness (P < 0.001). The average difference between individual effect-site concentrations at return and loss of consciousness was only 0.17 +/- 0.32 mug/mL (95% confidence interval for the difference 0.09-0.25 mug/mL). Our results thus suggest that individual titration to loss of consciousness is an alternative to dosing propofol on the basis of average population requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 110
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The determinants of propofol induction of anesthesia dose [J].
Adachi, YU ;
Watanabe, K ;
Higuchi, H ;
Satoh, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) :656-661
[2]   CONCENTRATIONS OF DESFLURANE AND PROPOFOL THAT SUPPRESS RESPONSE TO COMMAND IN HUMANS [J].
CHORTKOFF, BS ;
EGER, EI ;
CRANKSHAW, DP ;
GONSOWSKI, CT ;
DUTTON, RC ;
IONESCU, P .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :737-743
[3]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL SELECTION FOR TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL - ASSESSMENT OF 3 PARAMETER SETS [J].
COETZEE, JF ;
GLEN, JB ;
WIUM, CA ;
BOSHOFF, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1328-1345
[4]   EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATION 50 FOR PROPOFOL WITH AND WITHOUT 67-PERCENT NITROUS-OXIDE [J].
DAVIDSON, JAH ;
MACLEOD, AD ;
HOWIE, JC ;
WHITE, M ;
KENNY, GNC .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (05) :458-464
[5]   Automated responsiveness test (ART) predicts loss of consciousness and adverse physiologic responses during propofol conscious sedation [J].
Doufas, AG ;
Bakhshandeh, M ;
Bjorksten, AR ;
Greif, R ;
Sessler, DI .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (04) :585-592
[6]   The development of 'Diprifusor': a TCI system for propofol [J].
Glen, JB .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 :13-21
[7]   Propofol effective concentration 50 and its relationship to bispectral index [J].
Irwin, MG ;
Hui, TWC ;
Milne, SE ;
Kenny, GNC .
ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (03) :242-248
[8]   Effect-site concentration of propofol for recovery of consciousness is virtually independent of fentanyl effect-site concentration [J].
Iwakiri, H ;
Nagata, O ;
Matsukawa, T ;
Ozaki, M ;
Sessler, DI .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (06) :1651-1655
[9]   The influence of hemorrhagic shock on propofol - A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis [J].
Johnson, KB ;
Egan, TD ;
Kern, SE ;
White, JL ;
McJames, SW ;
Syroid, N ;
Whiddon, D ;
Church, T .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (02) :409-420
[10]   Awakening propofol concentration with and without blood-effect site equilibration after short-term and long-term administration of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia [J].
Kazama, T ;
Ikeda, K ;
Morita, K ;
Sanjo, Y .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (04) :928-934