Does the sequence of high-dose rate brachytherapy boost and IMRT for prostate cancer impact early toxicity outcomes? Results from a single institution analysis

被引:0
作者
Roy, Amit [1 ]
Brenneman, Randall J. [1 ]
Hogan, Jacob [1 ]
Barnes, Justin M. [1 ]
Huang, Yi [1 ]
Morris, Robert [1 ]
Goddu, Sreekrishna [1 ]
Altman, Michael [1 ]
Garcia-Ramirez, Jose [1 ]
Li, Harold [1 ]
Zoberi, Jacqueline E. [1 ]
Bullock, Arnold [2 ]
Kim, Eric [2 ]
Smith, Zachary [2 ]
Figenshau, Robert [2 ]
Andriole, Gerald L. [2 ]
Baumann, Brian C. [1 ]
Michalski, Jeff M. [1 ]
Gay, Hiram A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 4921 Parkview Pl,LL,Campus Box 8224, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
High-dose rate; Brachytherapy; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Prostate cancer; Androgen deprivation therapy; Toxicity; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; II CLINICAL-TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; ONE FRACTION; 19; GY; MONOTHERAPY; MEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We present the first report comparing early toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost upfront versus intensity modulated RT (IMRT) upfront combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as definitive management for intermediate risk or higher prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: We reviewed all non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who received HDR-BT boost from 2014 to 2019. HDR-BT boost was offered to patients with intermediate-risk disease or higher. ADT use and IMRT target volume was based on NCCN risk group. IMRT dose was typically 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles +/- pelvic lymph nodes. HDR-BT dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction, delivered approximately 3 weeks before or after IMRT. The sequence was based on physician preference. Biochemical recurrence was defined per ASTRO definition. Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0. Pearson Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare toxicity rates. P-value < 0.05 was significant. Results: Fifty-eight received HDR-BT upfront (majority 2014-2016) and 57 IMRT upfront (majority 2017-2018). Median follow-up was 26.0 months. The two cohorts were well-balanced for baseline patient/disease characteristics and treatment factors. There were differences in treatment sequence based on the year in which patients received treatment. Overall, rates of grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity were <1%. There was no significant difference in acute or late GI or GU toxicity between the two groups. Conclusion: We found no significant difference in GI/GU toxicity in intermediate-risk or higher prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-BT boost upfront versus IMRT upfront combined with ADT. These findings suggest that either approach may be reasonable. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COMMON TERMINOLOGY C
  • [2] Single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: toxicities and early outcomes from a single institutional experience
    Barnes, Justin M.
    Gabani, Prashant
    Sanders, Max
    Chundury, Anupama
    Altman, Michael
    Garcia-Ramirez, Jose
    Li, Harold
    Zoberi, Jacqueline E.
    Baumann, Brian C.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (05) : 399 - 408
  • [3] Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: Late toxicity and patient reported outcomes from a randomized phase II clinical trial
    Corkum, Mark
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Hasan, Yaser
    Chung, Hans T.
    Tseng, Chia-Lin
    McGuffin, Merrylee
    Cheung, Patrick
    Szumacher, Ewa
    Liu, Stanley
    Chu, William
    Zhang, Liying
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Morton, Gerard
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 156 : 160 - 165
  • [4] TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC)
    COX, JD
    STETZ, J
    PAJAK, TF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05): : 1341 - 1346
  • [5] A Brief Review of Low-Dose Rate (LDR) and High-Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy Boost for High-Risk Prostate
    Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    Patel, Sagar
    Baumann, Brian C.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [6] Holloway C, 2007, BRACHYTHERAPY APPL T, V1st, P181
  • [7] High dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Hoskin, P.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2008, 12 (6-7): : 512 - 514
  • [8] GEC/ESTRO recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: An update
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Colombo, Alessandro
    Henry, Ann
    Niehoff, Peter
    Hellebust, Taran Paulsen
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    Kovacs, Gyorgy
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [9] Randomised trial of external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localised prostate cancer
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Rojas, Ana M.
    Bownes, Peter J.
    Lowe, Gerry J.
    Ostler, Peter J.
    Bryant, Linda
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 103 (02) : 217 - 222
  • [10] PHASE II TRIAL OF COMBINED HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AND EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF RTOG 0321
    Hsu, I-Chow
    Bae, Kyounghwa
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Pouliot, Jean
    Purdy, James
    Ibbott, Geoffrey
    Speight, Joycelyn
    Vigneault, Eric
    Ivker, Robert
    Sandler, Howard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : 751 - 758