Evaluation of Different Methods of Optical Impression Making on the Marginal Gap of Onlays Created with CEREC 3D

被引:71
作者
da Costa, J. B. [1 ]
Pelogia, F. [2 ]
Hagedorn, B. [1 ]
Ferracane, J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
关键词
CERAMIC CROWN SYSTEMS; INTERNAL FIT; CAD/CAM;
D O I
10.2341/09-178-L
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study evaluated the marginal gaps on several surfaces of onlays created with the Cerec 3D system using one intraoral and two extraoral optical impression methods. Methods: A human molar (#19) was mounted with its adjacent teeth on a typodont (Frasaco) and prepared for a MODL onlay. The typodont was assembled in the mannequin head in order to simulate clinical conditions. The same operator took 36 individual optical impressions using a CEREC 3D camera. For group 1 (IP), a thin layer of titanium dioxide powder (CEREC powder-VITA) was applied directly onto the surface of the preparation for imaging (n=12). For group 2 (EP), a sectional impression was taken with hydrocolloid Identic Syringable (Dux Dental), a die made with polyvinylsiloxane KwikkModel Scan (R-dental Dentalerzeugnisse GmbH) and powdered with titanium dioxide for imaging (n=12). For group 3 (ES), a sectional impression was taken with PVS and a sectional stock tray, a die fabricated in stone (Diamond die- HI-TEC Dental Products) and the die being imaged without powdering (n=12). One operator designed and machined the onlays in Vita Blocks Mark II for Cerec (VITA) using a CEREC 3D. The marginal gaps (pm) were measured with an optical microscope (50x) at 12 points, three on each surface of the MODL. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey's (p=0.05). Results: The overall mean marginal gaps (mu m) for the three methods were: IP=111.6 (+/- 34.0); EP=161.4 (+/- 37.6) and ES=116.8 (+/- 42.3). IP and ES were equal, but both were significantly less than EP. The pooled mean marginal gaps (mu m) for the occlusal = 110.5 (+/- 39) and lingual = 111.5 (+/- 30.5) surfaces were equivalent and significantly less than the distal = 136.5 (+/- 42.5) and mesial = 161.1 (+/- 43.3). Conclusion: The marginal gap of CEREC 3D onlay restorations was not different when the optical impression was taken intraorally vs extraorally using a stone cast that does not require powdering. The lingual and occlusal surfaces showed the lowest gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Flexural strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars [J].
Apholt, W ;
Bindl, A ;
Lüthy, H ;
Mörmann, WH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (03) :260-267
[2]   Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth [J].
Beschnidt, SM ;
Strub, JR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 26 (07) :582-593
[3]   Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays [J].
Denissen, H ;
Dozic, A ;
van der Zel, J ;
van Waas, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (05) :506-513
[4]  
Hembree J H Jr, 1995, Quintessence Int, V26, P145
[5]   ANTERIOR CROWNS AND GINGIVAL HEALTH [J].
JANENKO, C ;
SMALES, RJ .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1979, 24 (04) :225-230
[6]  
Krämer N, 2000, AM J DENT, V13, p60D
[7]   Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems [J].
Lee, Kyu-Bok ;
Park, Charn-Woon ;
Kim, Kyo-Han ;
Kwon, Tae-Yub .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (03) :422-426
[8]  
Limkangwalmongkol Penwadee, 2007, J Prosthodont, V16, P233, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00186.x
[9]  
Masek R, 2003, Int J Comput Dent, V6, P75
[10]  
McLaren E A, 1998, Compend Contin Educ Dent, V19, P307