Validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-MV) in cancer patients

被引:24
作者
Li, Yu-Chi [1 ]
Wang, Hsiu-Hung [2 ]
Ho, Chung-Han [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Hwa Univ Med Technol, Dept Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Pharm, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; TERMINALLY-ILL; HEALTH-CARE; FAMILY; VALIDATION; SIMPLICITY; THERAPY; BURDEN; DEATH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0203111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nurses play an important role in maintaining patients' dignity. How to measure patients' dignity and dignity-related distress is an important issue in nursing care. Use of a reliable and valid tool assessing dignity-related distress in patients is necessary. The study investigated the validity and reliability of the Mandarin Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-MV) in cancer patients. The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) was translated into the Mandarin language using forward and back translation. A convenience sample of 125 adult cancer patients was recruited from the oncology ward of a medical center in southern Taiwan. Factor analysis with principal axis factoring extraction method and oblique rotation (promax) was used to assess the construct validity. Concurrent validity was established using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Mandarin version of Demoralization Scale (DS-MV) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Internal consistency was used to examine the reliability. Data were collected from February to May 2016. As a result of the factor analysis, four factors, including existential distress, loss of support and sense of meaning, symptom distress, and loss of autonomy. Concurrent validity showed that the PDI-MV was significantly correlated with the PHQ-9 (r = 0.25-0.54), DS-MV (r = 0.30-0.58) and the RSES (r = -0.08 to-0.30), Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PDI-MV and four factors were 0.95, 0.95, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.89 respectively. The PDI-MV is a psychometrically sound instrument assessing a broad range of dignity-related distress issues in cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index
    Zeng, Hongji
    Zeng, Jing
    Zhao, Weijia
    Luo, Siyu
    Luo, Pengchao
    Wang, Zhefeng
    Tian, Qingfeng
    Zeng, Xi
    DYSPHAGIA, 2025, 40 (02) : 419 - 430
  • [22] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the brief pain inventory-short form in patients with cancer pain
    Balta, Selin
    Unal-Ulutatar, Cagri
    Mirzayeva, Samaya
    Baskaya, Mehmet Cetin
    Akyuz, Gulseren
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 68 (02) : 214 - 221
  • [23] Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Caregiver Burden Inventory
    Uhm, Kyeong Eun
    Jung, Heeyoune
    Oh-Park, Mooyeon
    Lee, Bo Ram
    Kim, Eun Joo
    Kim, Jung Hwan
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Shin, Jinyoung
    Kim, Yoon-Sook
    Hyun, Cheolhwan
    Ko, Nayeon
    Lee, Jongmin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (03) : 209 - 214
  • [24] Reliability and Validity of the German Version of the Schema Mode Inventory
    Reiss, Neele
    Dominiak, Pauline
    Harris, Dawn
    Knoernschild, Claudia
    Schouten, Erik
    Jacob, Gitta A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 28 (04) : 297 - 304
  • [25] The Turkish Version of the Exercise Addiction Inventory: Validity and Reliability
    Aydin, Davut
    Baltaci, Umay Bilge
    Erzen, Evren
    Szabo, Attila
    Griffiths, Mark D.
    ADDICTA-THE TURKISH JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2023, 10 (02): : 184 - 193
  • [26] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Mandarin (Simplified) Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-OH45 among cancer patients
    Liu, Jie
    Gao, Jing
    Wu, Chen-Xi
    Bai, Ding-Xi
    Li, Xing
    Guo, Xiao-Xiao
    Yu, Jing-Ya
    Xiao, Qing-Qing
    Bao, Xin-Ru
    He, Lian-Ci
    Zhong, Yi-Zhu
    Chen, Shi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (02)
  • [27] The Patient Dignity Inventory: Just another evaluation tool? Experiences with advanced cancer patients
    Rullan, Maria
    Arantzamendi, Maria
    Carvajal, Ana
    Martinez, Marina
    Saenz De Ormijana, Amaia
    Centeno, Carlos
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2018, 16 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [28] Validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire among stroke patients in Mainland China
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Ke
    Li, Miao
    Gu, Jiaxin
    Li, Xintong
    Li, Mingzi
    Jin, Yi
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 38 (04) : 537 - 542
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Lai, Xiaoxing
    Zhu, Hongwei
    Du, Hongdi
    Wang, Jian
    Bo, Lin
    Huo, Xiaopeng
    DYSPHAGIA, 2021, 36 (04) : 670 - 679
  • [30] Turkish version of life balance inventory: Validity, reliability, and cultural adaptation study
    Inal, Ozgue
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Matuska, Kathleen
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2023, 30 (06) : 803 - 810