Sensitivity of CMOS based imagers and scaling perspectives

被引:130
作者
Lulé, T
Benthien, S
Keller, H
Mütze, F
Rieve, P
Seibel, K
Sommer, M
Böhm, M
机构
[1] Silicon Vis GmbH, Automot Vis Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[2] Silicon Vis GmbH, Consumer Prod Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[3] Univ Siegen, Inst Halbleitertech, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
关键词
active pixel sensors; CMOS image sensors; ISO speed; PG; scaling; sensitivity; TFA;
D O I
10.1109/16.877173
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
CMOS based imagers are beginning to compete against CCDs in many areas of the consumer market because of their system-on-a-chip capability, Sensitivity, however, is a main weakness of CMOS imagers and enhancements and deviations from standard CMOS processes are necessary to keep up sensitivity with downscaled process generations. In the introductory section several definitions for the sensitivity of image sensors are reviewed with regard to their potential to allow meaningful comparison of different detector structures. In the main section, the standard CMOS sensor architecture is compared to detector structures designed to improve the sensitivity, namely the photogate (PG), the pinned photodiode (PPD) and the thin film on ASIC (TFA) approach. The latter uses a vertical integration of the photodiode on top of the pixel transistors. A careful analysis of the relevant electrical, optical and technological parameters and many previously published experimental data for different imagers reveals that only the PPD and the TFA enhancements provide satisfactory sensitivity and withstand scaling down to 0.18 mu processes. Due to the higher fill factor and the higher quantum efficiency TFA provides significantly better values than PPD, The radiometric sensitivity of a 5 mum x 5 mum TFA pixel is found to amount to 11.9 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.25 mum process and 27.5 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.18 mum process.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2122
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   System considerations in the design of QWIP-based thermal imagers [J].
Brill, B ;
Sarusi, G .
INFRARED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS XXIV, PTS 1-2, 1998, 3436 :270-277
[32]   Limitations and perspectives about scaling ozone impacts in trees [J].
Kolb, TE ;
Matyssek, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2001, 115 (03) :373-392
[33]   Collaboration, Adaptation, and Scaling: Perspectives on Environmental Governance for Sustainability [J].
Schoon, Michael ;
Cox, Michael E. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03)
[34]   New perspectives in turbulence: Scaling laws, asymptotics, and intermittency [J].
Barenblatt, GI ;
Chorin, AJ .
SIAM REVIEW, 1998, 40 (02) :265-291
[35]   Impact of CMOS technology scaling on the atmospheric neutron soft error rate [J].
Hazucha, P ;
Svensson, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 47 (06) :2586-2594
[36]   A simple voltage scaling formula for low-power CMOS circuits [J].
Kang, DG ;
Park, YJ ;
Min, HS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1999, 46 (04) :803-805
[37]   Sensitivity Assessment of CMOS as Element of the Face Identification Algorithm [J].
Zaytseva, Ekaterina V. .
2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE QUALITY MANAGEMENT, TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SECURITY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (IT&QM&IS), 2018, :760-762
[38]   MetaRGBX-Net: RGB Sensitivity and Cross-Talk Prediction in CMOS Image Sensor [J].
Lee, Janghyeon ;
Kim, Byounggyu ;
Lee, Yongkeun .
IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, 2025, 46 (07) :1235-1238
[39]   Investigation of Scaling on the Sensitivity and Performance of Tunnel FET Biosensor [J].
Goma, Priyanka ;
Rana, Ashwani Kumar .
IEEE SENSORS LETTERS, 2023, 7 (08)
[40]   Monolithic CMOS Sensors for high energy physics - Challenges and perspectives [J].
Snoeys, W. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2023, 1056