Sensitivity of CMOS based imagers and scaling perspectives

被引:128
|
作者
Lulé, T
Benthien, S
Keller, H
Mütze, F
Rieve, P
Seibel, K
Sommer, M
Böhm, M
机构
[1] Silicon Vis GmbH, Automot Vis Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[2] Silicon Vis GmbH, Consumer Prod Grp, D-57078 Siegen, Germany
[3] Univ Siegen, Inst Halbleitertech, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
关键词
active pixel sensors; CMOS image sensors; ISO speed; PG; scaling; sensitivity; TFA;
D O I
10.1109/16.877173
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
CMOS based imagers are beginning to compete against CCDs in many areas of the consumer market because of their system-on-a-chip capability, Sensitivity, however, is a main weakness of CMOS imagers and enhancements and deviations from standard CMOS processes are necessary to keep up sensitivity with downscaled process generations. In the introductory section several definitions for the sensitivity of image sensors are reviewed with regard to their potential to allow meaningful comparison of different detector structures. In the main section, the standard CMOS sensor architecture is compared to detector structures designed to improve the sensitivity, namely the photogate (PG), the pinned photodiode (PPD) and the thin film on ASIC (TFA) approach. The latter uses a vertical integration of the photodiode on top of the pixel transistors. A careful analysis of the relevant electrical, optical and technological parameters and many previously published experimental data for different imagers reveals that only the PPD and the TFA enhancements provide satisfactory sensitivity and withstand scaling down to 0.18 mu processes. Due to the higher fill factor and the higher quantum efficiency TFA provides significantly better values than PPD, The radiometric sensitivity of a 5 mum x 5 mum TFA pixel is found to amount to 11.9 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.25 mum process and 27.5 V/(muJ/cm(2)) for a 0.18 mum process.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2122
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Shunting inhibition-based on-chip processing for CMOS imagers
    Boussaid, F
    Bermak, A
    Bouzerdoum, A
    ICONIP'02: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING: COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE E-AGE, 2002, : 1310 - 1314
  • [12] Optimum design of CMOS APS imagers
    Shilin, VA
    Skrylev, PA
    Stempkovsky, AL
    PHOTONICS, DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS II, 2003, 5036 : 157 - 164
  • [13] Figure-of-merit for CMOS imagers
    Lin, CSS
    Chang, MCF
    Mathur, BP
    Standley, DL
    SENSORS AND CAMERA SYSTEMS FOR SCIENTIFIC, INDUSTRIAL, AND DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY APPLICATIONS III, 2002, 4669 : 313 - 323
  • [14] Rockwell introduces family of CMOS imagers
    不详
    COMPUTER DESIGN, 1998, 37 (04): : 45 - 45
  • [15] An optical source for characterizing CMOS imagers
    Hancock, JJ
    Baker, DJ
    Ware, GA
    NONIMAGING OPTICS AND EFFICIENT ILLUMINATION SYSTEMS, 2004, 5529 : 140 - 149
  • [16] Design and scaling of monocentric multiscale imagers
    Tremblay, Eric J.
    Marks, Daniel L.
    Brady, David J.
    Ford, Joseph E.
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2012, 51 (20) : 4691 - 4702
  • [17] Terahertz imagers based on metamaterial structures monolithically integrated in standard CMOS technologies
    Escorcia, Ivonne
    Grant, James P.
    Gouveia, Luis
    Cumming, David R. S.
    IMAGE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES: MATERIALS, DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS V, 2018, 10656
  • [18] Analytical charge collection and MTF model for photodiode-based CMOS imagers
    Lin, CSS
    Mathur, BP
    Chang, MCF
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2002, 49 (05) : 754 - 761
  • [19] A novel DPS integrator for fast CMOS imagers
    Margarit, J. M.
    Sabadell, J.
    Teres, L.
    Serra-Graells, F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-10, 2008, : 1632 - 1635
  • [20] High-speed CMOS imagers are flexible
    Brandt, T
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2004, 40 (02): : 83 - +