Alpha oscillations and event-related potentials reflect distinct dynamics of attribute construction and evidence accumulation in dietary decision making

被引:10
作者
HajiHosseini, Azadeh [1 ]
Hutcherson, Cendri A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Dept Mkt, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
THETA OSCILLATIONS; SELF-CONTROL; WORKING-MEMORY; EEG ALPHA; STIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION; VMPFC;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.60874
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
How does regulatory focus alter attribute value construction (AVC) and evidence accumulation (EA)? We recorded electroencephalogram during food choices while participants responded naturally or regulated their choices by attending to health attributes or decreasing attention to taste attributes. Using a drift diffusion model, we predicted the time course of neural signals associated with AVC and EA. Results suggested that event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with the time course of model-predicted taste-attribute signals, with no modulation by regulation. By contrast, suppression of frontal and occipital alpha power correlated with the time course of EA, tracked tastiness according to its goal relevance, and predicted individual variation in successful down-regulation of tastiness. Additionally, an earlier rise in frontal and occipital theta power represented food tastiness more strongly during regulation and predicted a weaker influence of food tastiness on behaviour. Our findings illuminate how regulation modifies the representation of attributes during the process of EA.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus [J].
Axmacher, Nikolai ;
Henseler, Melanie M. ;
Jensen, Ole ;
Weinreich, Ilona ;
Elger, Christian E. ;
Fell, Juergen .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (07) :3228-3233
[2]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[3]   Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Frank, Michael J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (08) :414-421
[4]   Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Wiecki, Thomas V. ;
Cohen, Michael X. ;
Figueroa, Christina M. ;
Samanta, Johan ;
Sherman, Scott J. ;
Frank, Michael J. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (11) :1462-U140
[5]   EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[6]   Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions [J].
Forstmann, B. U. ;
Ratcliff, R. ;
Wagenmakers, E. -J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 67, 2016, 67 :641-666
[7]   The role of alpha-band brain oscillations as a sensory suppression mechanism during selective attention [J].
Foxe, John J. ;
Snyder, Adam C. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[8]   The neural basis of decision making [J].
Gold, Joshua I. ;
Shadlen, Michael N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 30 :535-574
[9]  
HajiHosseini A, 2020, EEG DYNAMICS SELF RE
[10]   Frontal midline theta and N200 amplitude reflect complementary information about expectancy and outcome evaluation [J].
Hajihosseini, Azadeh ;
Holroyd, Clay B. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 50 (06) :550-562