Market response to European regulation of business combinations

被引:57
作者
Aktas, N
de Bodt, E
Roll, R
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Lille 2, F-59020 Lille, France
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0022109000003197
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Acquisitions, mergers, and other business agreements face increasing regulatory scrutiny, even when they involve firms domiciled outside the territory of regulatory authorities. Recent examples include mergers between American firms that were approved by American regulators but blocked by European regulators. Regulatory reciprocity seems a likely future trend. There are obvious consequences for the successful completion of future business combinations. This paper explains the regulatory procedures of the European Commission with respect to business combinations, documents the price reactions of subject firms on dates from the initial announcement to the final regulatory decision, and studies whether European regulators tend to shield European firms from foreign competition. Our main results are: i) the market clearly reacts to European regulatory intervention even when the subject firms are non-European, ii) the probability of intervention is not related to the nationality of the bidder, however, iii) when intervention does occur, the market anticipates it will be more costly when the bidder is non-European, so protectionism cannot be rejected outright, and iv) regulatory interventions are anticipated by investors, so they affect the initial announcement returns.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 757
页数:27
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AKTAS N., 2001, EUROPEAN FINANCIAL M, V7, P447
[2]   New evidence and perspectives on mergers [J].
Andrade, G ;
Mitchell, M ;
Stafford, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (02) :103-120
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HDB ECONOMETRICS
[4]   DOS Kapital:: Has antitrust action against Microsoft created value in the computer industry? [J].
Bittlingmayer, G ;
Hazlett, TW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 55 (03) :329-359
[5]   STOCK RETURNS, REAL ACTIVITY, AND THE TRUST QUESTION [J].
BITTLINGMAYER, G .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (05) :1701-1730
[6]   EVENT-STUDY METHODOLOGY UNDER CONDITIONS OF EVENT-INDUCED VARIANCE [J].
BOEHMER, E ;
MUSUMECI, J ;
POULSEN, AB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 30 (02) :253-272
[7]   SYNERGISTIC GAINS FROM CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS AND THEIR DIVISION BETWEEN THE STOCKHOLDERS OF TARGET AND ACQUIRING FIRMS [J].
BRADLEY, M ;
DESAI, A ;
KIM, EH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 21 (01) :3-40
[8]   An examination of stock-price effects of EU merger control policy [J].
Brady, U ;
Feinberg, RM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 18 (06) :885-900
[9]  
BRIS A, 2002, MERGER LAWS GLOBALIZ
[10]   A NONPARAMETRIC TEST FOR ABNORMAL SECURITY-PRICE PERFORMANCE IN EVENT STUDIES [J].
CORRADO, CJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :385-395