A new method to multi - objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger for waste heat recovery

被引:5
作者
Kaya, Ibrahim [1 ]
Ust, Yasin [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Shell and tube heat exchanger; heat exchanger thermo; economic modeling; optimization; waste heat recovery; optimal design heat exchanger; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; COST;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2021.1928336
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Nowadays, fossil energy sources are decreasing gradually and environmental problems are increasing thus energy savings are among the current topics. In this context, determining the optimum design parameters of heat exchangers can provide significant savings during the economic life of waste heat recovery systems. However, due to discrete decision variables, highly nonlinearity, trapped to local optimum and high computation time, the optimization of a heat exchanger can be a robust problem. Therefore, this research introduces Univariate Search Method 2 (USM2) that can cope with such difficulties for multi-objective optimization. USM2 is based on weighted sum approach and uses a single-objective optimization method by moving from two arms on Pareto Front. To short computational time, Univariate Search Method (USM) has been chosen as a single-objective optimization method. The well-known Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Non-dominant Sorting Genetic Algorithm-2 (NSGA-2) methods were also used to compare USM and USM2 with fitness values and number of the function call corresponding to the computational time. According to the results, GA has offered better fitness values for both objectives than USM yet GA has much more number of the function call. However, USM2 has offered a better design range in the Pareto-Front than NSGA-2 despite having almost half of the function call number of NSGA-2. Moreover, the solutions offered by the USM2 at the ends of the Pareto-Front are highly competitive when compared to GA's solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:8225 / 8242
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Sizing and selection of heat exchanger at defined saving-investment ratio [J].
Agra, Ozden .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (05) :727-734
[2]  
Arora J.S., 2012, Introduction to Optimum Design
[4]  
Bejan A, 2003, HEAT TRANSFER HDB, V1
[5]  
Chapra S. C., 2006, NUMERICAL METHODS EN
[6]  
CHURCHILL SW, 1977, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V84, P91
[7]   Optimization of cross flow heat exchangers for thermoelectric waste heat recovery [J].
Crane, DT ;
Jackson, GS .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (9-10) :1565-1582
[8]  
Donald Q., 1950, PROCESS HEAT TRANSFE, V871
[9]   A robust stochastic approach for design optimization of air cooled heat exchangers [J].
Doodman, A. R. ;
Fesanghary, M. ;
Hosseini, R. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (7-8) :1240-1245
[10]   Thermoeconomic optimization of baffle spacing for shell and tube heat exchangers [J].
Eryener, D .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (11-12) :1478-1489