Immediate PrEP when accessing PEP: A service evaluation

被引:2
作者
Cockbain, Beatrice [1 ]
Whitlock, Gary [1 ]
McOwan, Alan [1 ]
Patel, Sheel [1 ]
Nugent, Diarmuid [1 ]
Girometti, Nicolo [1 ]
Suchak, Tara [1 ]
Gedela, Keerti [1 ]
Tittle, Vicky [1 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, 56 Dean St Clin, London W1D 6AE, England
关键词
HIV; PEP; post exposure prophylaxis; pre-exposure prophylaxis; PrEP;
D O I
10.1111/hiv.13310
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives In January 2021, 56 Dean Street, a London sexual health clinic, changed clinic policy so that all those attending for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) were offered quick-start opt-out pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) following completion of the 28-day PEP course. We assessed the uptake of this quick-start PrEP in service users attending for PEP. Methods We undertook a case note review of those who received PEP during the 2-week period from 17 February to 1 March 2021, assessing the data and comparing them to those from the same period in 2020 (15 February-28 February 2020) before quick-start opt-out PrEP was introduced. Results The number of service users receiving PEP was 82 in 2020 and 42 in 2021, of which an unmet PrEP need was demonstrated in 81.7% (67/82) in 2020 and 78.6% (33/42) in 2021 (p = 0.8106). Of those with an unmet need, a higher proportion (97.0% [32/33]) were offered PrEP in 2021 following the introduction of opt-out PrEP compared with the 85.1% (57/67) in 2020 (p = 0.0953). Of those eligible for PrEP who were offered it during their PEP consultation, 53.1% (17/32) in 2021 were dispensed PrEP compared with 17.5% (10/57) in 2020 (p = 0.0007). Conclusion Since the introduction of quick-start opt-out PrEP, uptake in eligible candidates increased from 17.5% to 53.1%. This suggests that this strategy was acceptable to service users.
引用
收藏
页码:1108 / 1112
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, BASHH BHIVA UK GUIDE
  • [2] Post-exposure prophylaxis in the era of pre-exposure prophylaxis
    Atim, M.
    Girometti, N.
    Hyndman, I
    McOwan, A.
    Whitlock, G.
    [J]. HIV MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (10) : 668 - 670
  • [3] Brown J., 2021, Commons library research briefing no. 9068
  • [4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Public Health Service, 2018, PREEXP PROPH PREV HI
  • [5] Gregson S, 2021, LANCET HIV, V8, pe251, DOI 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00068-0
  • [6] 'Stay at home horizontal ellipsis ': exploring the impact of the COVID-19 public health response on sexual behaviour and health service use among men who have sex with men: findings from a large online survey in the UK
    Howarth, Alison R.
    Saunders, John
    Reid, David
    Kelly, Isabelle
    Wayal, Sonali
    Weatherburn, Peter
    Hughes, Gwenda
    Mercer, Catherine H.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2022, 98 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [7] COVID-19 restrictions and changing sexual behaviours in HIV-negative MSM at high risk of HIV infection in London, UK
    Hyndman, Iain
    Nugent, Diarmuid
    Whitlock, Gary George
    McOwan, Alan
    Girometti, Nicolo
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2021, 97 (07) : 521 - 524
  • [8] Kirby T, 2020, LANCET, V395, P1025, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30720-0
  • [9] What are the characteristics of, and clinical outcomes in men who have sex with men prescribed HIV postexposure prophylaxis following sexual exposure (PEPSE) at sexual health clinics in England?
    Mitchell, Holly
    Furegato, Martina
    Hughes, Gwenda
    Field, Nigel
    Nardone, Anthony
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2017, 93 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [10] Immediate PrEP after PEP: Results from an Observational Nurse-Led PEP2PrEP Study
    O'Byrne, Patrick
    Orser, Lauren
    Vandyk, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS OF AIDS CARE, 2020, 19