DSM-5 section III personality traits and section II personality disorders in a Flemish community sample

被引:35
作者
Bastiaens, Tim [1 ]
Smits, Dirk [2 ,3 ]
De Hert, Marc [1 ,4 ]
Vanwalleghem, Dominique [1 ]
Claes, Laurence [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UPC KU Leuven Campus Kortenberg, B-3070 Kortenberg, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Tiensestr 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Odisee Univ Coll, Warmoesberg 26, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosci, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci CAPRI, Univ Pl 1, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
PID-5; Community sample; Cross-walk; Reliability; Convergent validity; Divergent validity; PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY; FIT INDEXES; MODEL; PID-5; CONVERGENCE; INVENTORY; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.056
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger et al., 2012) is a dimensional self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology according to the criterion B of the DSM-5 Section III personality model. In the current issue of DSM, this dimensional Section III personality model co-exists with the Section II categorical personality model derived from DSM-IV-TR. Therefore, investigation of the inter-relatedness of both models across populations and languages is warranted. In this study, we first examined the factor structure and reliability of the PID-5 in a Flemish community sample (N=509) by means of exploratory structural equation modeling and alpha coefficients. Next, we investigated the predictive ability of section III personality traits in relation to section II personality disorders through correlations and stepwise regression analyses. Results revealed a five factor solution for the PID-5, with adequate reliability of the facet scales. The variance in Section II personality disorders could be predicted by their theoretically comprising Section III personality traits, but additional Section III personality traits augmented this prediction. Based on current results, we discuss the Section II personality disorder conceptualization and the Section III personality disorder operationalization. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]   A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures [J].
Anderson, Jaime ;
Snider, Stephen ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Krueger, Robert ;
Hopwood, Christopher .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 216 (03) :363-372
[3]   On the Convergence Between PSY-5 Domains and PID-5 Domains and Facets: Implications for Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Traits [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Bagby, R. Michael ;
Quilty, Lena C. ;
Veltri, Carlo O. C. ;
Markon, Kristian E. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :286-294
[4]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :397-438
[5]   The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling [J].
Bandalos, DL .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (01) :78-102
[6]  
Bandalos D, 2008, INT J PSYCHOL, V43, P549
[7]   The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample [J].
Bastiaens, Tim ;
Claes, Laurence ;
Smits, Dirk ;
De Clercq, Barbara ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
Rossi, Gina ;
Vanwalleghem, Dominique ;
Vermote, Rudi ;
Lowyck, Benedicte ;
Claes, Stephan ;
De Hert, Marc .
ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (01) :42-51
[8]   On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Herzberg, PY .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (02) :186-203
[9]   LIMITATIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF FOURFOLD TABLE ANALYSIS TO HOSPITAL DATA [J].
BERKSON, J .
BIOMETRICS BULLETIN, 1946, 2 (03) :47-53
[10]  
Costa PT., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)