Sustainable solid waste management system using multi-objective decision-making model: a method for maximizing social acceptance in Hoi An city, Vietnam

被引:28
作者
Giang Minh Hoang [1 ]
Fujiwara, Takeshi [2 ]
Toan Song Pham Phu [2 ,3 ]
Luong Duc Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Civil Engn, Fac Environm Engn, Dept Environm Technol & Management, 55 Giai Phong Rd, Hanoi 113021, Vietnam
[2] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Environm & Life Sci, Dept Environm Sci, Kita Ku, 3-1-1 Tsushima, Okayama 7008530, Japan
[3] Univ Danang, Univ Technol & Educ, Fac Chem Technol Environm, Dept Environm Engn, 48 Cao Thang, Hai Chau 55100, Danang, Vietnam
关键词
Decision support system; Multi-objective decision-making method; Optimization model; Social acceptance; Sustainable waste management; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-018-3498-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main aim of this study was to develop a decision support system for sustainable municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in Hoi An city (HAC), Vietnam. A face-to-face interview was conducted with local experts including authorities, citizens, waste collection contractors and recyclers to identify main objectives of waste management system and appropriate treatment methods. A multi-objective optimization model was proposed using non-linear programming approach. An interactive method known as reference point method (RPM) was applied for solving the problem with three objectives including cost minimization, landfill minimization and emission minimization. As a result, the efficient waste-flow-allocation and the optimal capacity of disposal facilities were determined by intense discussion and agreement among decision-makers. Waste incineration, anaerobic digestion, sanitary landfill and current recycling activities should be applied with a cost of about 2300 US$ daily. Also, the daily emission of various pollutants was about 35 metric tons, and the greenhouse gas (GHG) is 313 tons CO2-eq.
引用
收藏
页码:34137 / 34147
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Mass balances and life cycle inventory of home composting of organic waste [J].
Andersen, J. K. ;
Boldrin, A. ;
Christensen, T. H. ;
Scheutz, C. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (9-10) :1934-1942
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, IPCC GUID NAT GREENH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, FUZZY SET THEORY ITS
[4]   Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul [J].
Beskese, Ahmet ;
Demir, H. Handan ;
Ozcan, H. Kurtulus ;
Okten, H. Eser .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (07) :3513-3521
[5]  
Buyukozkan G., 2017, Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications, V113, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-42993-9_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42993-9_2]
[6]  
Chang NB, 2015, SUSTAINABLE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH, P235
[7]  
Chu MT, 2014, MANAGEMENT BOARD CHA
[8]   Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey [J].
Coban, Asli ;
Ertis, Irem Firtina ;
Cavdaroglu, Nur Ayvaz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 :159-167
[9]   Multi-criteria decision making to support waste management: A critical review of current practices and methods [J].
Coelho, Lineker M. Goulart ;
Lange, Lisete C. ;
Coelho, Hosmanny M. G. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (01) :3-28
[10]   An environmentally sustainable decision model for urban solid waste management [J].
Costi, P ;
Minciardi, R ;
Robba, M ;
Rovatti, M ;
Sacile, R .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 24 (03) :277-295