A systematic review to study the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for sexually abused children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder

被引:0
作者
Passarela, Cristiane de Medeiros [1 ]
Mendes, Deise Daniela [1 ]
Mari, Jair de Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Psychiat, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA CLINICA | 2010年 / 37卷 / 02期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
PTSD; sexual abuse; children; treatment; systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; FEMALE VICTIMS; PTSD SYMPTOMS; GIRLS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; DISCLOSURE; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; DEPRESSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), one of the possible consequences of sexual abuse of children and adolescents, may be found in about 40% to 50% of the cases. Objective: Conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for the treatment of sexually abused children and adolescents with PTSD. Methods: A search for randomized clinical trials that evaluated PTSD in children and adolescents from 1980 to February 1, 2006 was conducted in the following databases: MedLine, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group Database of Trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Science Citation Index (SciSearch), and PILOTS. References in all clinical trials selected were hand-searched. Results: Of the 43 studies initially selected, only three met inclusion criteria. The following comparisons were found in the studies: CBT to treat child and family member versus no treatment (waiting list); CBT to treat only child, only parents, or both versus community care; and trauma-focused CBT versus child-centered therapy (CCT). Results for CBT treatment of PTSD were better than no treatment (waiting list) (p < 0.05), community care (p < 0.01) and CCT (p < 0.01). The comparison of child-only CBT and family CBT (parents or caretakers and children) did not reveal any significant differences in efficacy, and both showed significant improvement of symptoms. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of CBT (child-only and family) versus no treatment (waiting list and community care) in the remission of patients who completed treatment. Remission rates in treatment and control groups were 60% and 20%, and this difference in favor of CBT was statistically significant (RR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.88; p = 0.02). No controlled studies were found that compared CBT and pharmacotherapy. Discussion: Treatment with CBT reduces PTSD symptoms in sexually abused children and adolescents, with no differences between therapy with only the victim or with the victim and a family member. No studies compared CBT and pharmacotherapy or the efficacy of combined treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric diagnoses in three groups of abused children (sexual, physical, and both) [J].
Ackerman, PT ;
Newton, JEO ;
McPherson, WB ;
Jones, JG ;
Dykman, RA .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1998, 22 (08) :759-774
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[3]  
Arata C M, 2000, Child Maltreat, V5, P28, DOI 10.1177/1077559500005001004
[4]  
BAKER CR, 1987, THESIS U MARYLAND CO
[5]   THE EFFECTS OF DISCLOSURE AND INTERVENTION ON SEXUALLY ABUSED-CHILDREN [J].
BERLINER, L ;
CONTE, JR .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1995, 19 (03) :371-384
[6]  
Berliner L., 1996, CHILD MALTREATMENT, V1, P294, DOI DOI 10.1177/1077559596001004002
[7]  
BURKE MM, 1988, THESIS U GEORGIA ATH
[8]   Psychodrama groups for girls coping with trauma [J].
Carbonell, DM ;
Parteleno-Barehmi, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1999, 49 (03) :285-306
[9]   Translation cokernels of rational modules [J].
Carlin, KJ .
COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 2000, 28 (01) :1-13
[10]   Toward an empirical definition of pediatric PTSD: The phenomenology of PTSD symptoms in youth [J].
Carrion, VG ;
Weems, CF ;
Ray, R ;
Reiss, AL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 41 (02) :166-173