Equilibrium point damage prognosis models for structural health monitoring

被引:27
|
作者
Brown, RL [1 ]
Adams, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Ray W Herrick Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00113-5
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Most structural dynamic systems are of high order; however, they often exhibit phenomena that can be dealt with effectively using low order models. This paper presents a method for describing certain kinds of damage evolution in mechanical systems. The method relies on a simple principle that as damage evolves in a structural dynamic system, the damage indicator (i.e., diagnostic feature) behaves like a stable quasi-stationary equilibrium point in a subsidiary non-linear bifurcating system within the so-called damage center manifold. It is shown that just as linear normal modes govern the behavior of linear structures with idealized damping, so too do non-linear normal forms govern the evolution of damage within structures in many instances. The method is justified with citations from the literature on certain types of mechanical failure and then applied in an experimental case involving reversible damage in a bolted fastener. Off-line experiments on a rotorcraft fuselage show that the evolution of damage is sensitive to both temporal and spatial bifurcation parameters. A diagnostic sensing strategy whereby output-only transmissibility features are used to decrease the order of high order structural dynamic measurements is also described. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 611
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring
    Farrar, Charles R.
    Lieven, Nick A. J.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851): : 623 - 632
  • [2] Structural health monitoring and damage prognosis in fatigue
    Kulkarni, S. S.
    Achenbach, J. D.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2008, 7 (01): : 37 - 49
  • [3] Integration of structural health monitoring and fatigue damage prognosis
    Ling, You
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 28 : 89 - 104
  • [4] A multidisciplinary approach to structural health monitoring and damage prognosis of aerospace hotspots
    Chattopadhyay, A.
    Peralta, P.
    Papandreou-Suppappola, A.
    Kovvali, N.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 113 (1150): : 799 - 810
  • [5] Requirements for structural health monitoring/prognosis
    Thompson, B
    Malas, J
    Hughes, CK
    Golis, M
    Thompson, D
    Palmer, D
    Shannon, B
    Richards, V
    Djordjevic, B
    Rohklin, S
    Rummel, W
    Haeggstrom, E
    Panetta, P
    Rose, J
    Inanc, F
    Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vols 24A and 24B, 2005, 760 : 1987 - 2000
  • [6] Damage and safety prognosis of bridge structures based on structural health monitoring: Progress and challenges
    Zong, Zhou-Hong
    Zhong, Ru-Mian
    Zheng, Pei-Juan
    Qin, Zhong-Yuan
    Liu, Qi-Qi
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27 (12): : 46 - 57
  • [7] Damage prognosis of China ancient wooden buildings based on structural health monitoring system
    Jiang, Shao-Fei
    Li, Ni-Lei
    Shen, Sheng
    Wu, Ming-Hao
    Zhang, Ying
    SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2018, 2018, 10598
  • [8] Structural health monitoring of progressive damage
    Mollineaux, M.
    Rajagopal, R.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (04): : 583 - 600
  • [9] Damage bounding structural health monitoring
    Elwasia, Nazar
    Sundaresan, Mannur J.
    Schulz, Mark J.
    Ghoshal, Anindya
    Pai, P. Frank
    Tu, Peter K. C.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 17 (07) : 629 - 648
  • [10] Damage indicator defined as the distance between ARMA models for structural health monitoring
    Zheng, Haitao
    Mita, Akira
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2008, 15 (07): : 992 - 1005