Air quality and radiative impacts of Arctic shipping emissions in the summertime in northern Norway: from the local to the regional scale

被引:58
作者
Marelle, Louis [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, Jennie L. [1 ]
Raut, Jean-Christophe [1 ]
Law, Kathy S. [1 ]
Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka [3 ]
Johansson, Lasse [3 ]
Roiger, Anke [4 ]
Schlager, Hans [4 ]
Kim, Jin [4 ]
Reiter, Anja [4 ]
Weinzierl, Bernadett [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Univ, UVSQ, LATMOS IPSL,CNRS, Paris, France
[2] TOTAL SA, Direct Sci, F-92069 Paris, La Defense, France
[3] Finnish Meteorol Inst, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt DLR, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Inst Meteorol, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
EXHAUST EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME; MARINE STRATOCUMULUS; PETROLEUM ACTIVITIES; FUTURE EMISSIONS; MODELING SYSTEM; BALTIC SEA; CLIMATE; OZONE;
D O I
10.5194/acp-16-2359-2016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we quantify the impacts of shipping pollution on air quality and shortwave radiative effect in northern Norway, using WRF-Chem (Weather Research and Forecasting with chemistry) simulations combined with high-resolution, real-time STEAM2 (Ship Traffic Emissions Assessment Model version 2) shipping emissions. STEAM2 emissions are evaluated using airborne measurements from the ACCESS (Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society) aircraft campaign, which was conducted in the summer 2012, in two ways. First, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) are derived for specific ships by combining in situ measurements in ship plumes and FLEXPART-WRF plume dispersion modeling, and these values are compared to STEAM2 emissions for the same ships. Second, regional WRF-Chem runs with and without STEAM2 ship emissions are performed at two different resolutions, 3 km x 3 km and 15 km x 15 km, and evaluated against measurements along flight tracks and average campaign profiles in the marine boundary layer and lower troposphere. These comparisons show that differences between STEAM2 emissions and calculated emissions can be quite large (-57 to +148 %) for individual ships, but that WRF-Chem simulations using STEAM2 emissions reproduce well the average NOx, SO2 and O-3 measured during ACCESS flights. The same WRF-Chem simulations show that the magnitude of NOx and ozone (O-3) production from ship emissions at the surface is not very sensitive (<5 %) to the horizontal grid resolution (15 or 3 km), while surface PM10 particulate matter enhancements due to ships are moderately sensitive (15 %) to resolution. The 15 km resolution WRF-Chem simulations are used to estimate the regional impacts of shipping pollution in northern Norway. Our results indicate that ship emissions are an important source of pollution along the Norwegian coast, enhancing 15-day-averaged surface concentrations of NOx (similar to+80 %), SO2 (similar to+80 %), O-3 (similar to+5 %), black carbon (similar to+40 %), and PM2.5 (similar to+10 %). The residence time of black carbon originating from shipping emissions is 1.4 days. Over the same 15-day period, ship emissions in northern Norway have a global shortwave (direct C semi-direct C indirect) radiative effect of -9.3 mW m(-2).
引用
收藏
页码:2359 / 2379
页数:21
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US
    Ahmadov, R.
    McKeen, S.
    Trainer, M.
    Banta, R.
    Brewer, A.
    Brown, S.
    Edwards, P. M.
    de Gouw, J. A.
    Frost, G. J.
    Gilman, J.
    Helmig, D.
    Johnson, B.
    Karion, A.
    Koss, A.
    Langford, A.
    Lerner, B.
    Olson, J.
    Oltmans, S.
    Peischl, J.
    Petron, G.
    Pichugina, Y.
    Roberts, J. M.
    Ryerson, T.
    Schnell, R.
    Senff, C.
    Sweeney, C.
    Thompson, C.
    Veres, P. R.
    Warneke, C.
    Wild, R.
    Williams, E. J.
    Yuan, B.
    Zamora, R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (01) : 411 - 429
  • [2] Air quality monitoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution
    Aliabadi, A. A.
    Staebler, R. M.
    Sharma, S.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (05) : 2651 - 2673
  • [3] [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
  • [4] Emission factors of SO2, NOx and particles from ships in Neva Bay from ground-based and helicopter-borne measurements and AIS-based modeling
    Beecken, J.
    Mellqvist, J.
    Salo, K.
    Ekholm, J.
    Jalkanen, J. -P.
    Johansson, L.
    Litvinenko, V.
    Volodin, K.
    Frank-Kamenetsky, D. A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (09) : 5229 - 5241
  • [5] Briggs GA., 1965, J AIR POLLUTION CONT, V15, P433, DOI DOI 10.1080/00022470.1965.10468404
  • [6] The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1
    Brioude, J.
    Arnold, D.
    Stohl, A.
    Cassiani, M.
    Morton, D.
    Seibert, P.
    Angevine, W.
    Evan, S.
    Dingwell, A.
    Fast, J. D.
    Easter, R. C.
    Pisso, I.
    Burkhart, J.
    Wotawa, G.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (06) : 1889 - 1904
  • [7] Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean
    Capaldo, K
    Corbett, JJ
    Kasibhatla, P
    Fischbeck, P
    Pandis, SN
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 400 (6746) : 743 - 746
  • [8] CARLSON TN, 1978, J APPL METEOROL, V17, P998, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<0998:AOURCU>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Chen F, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P569, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO