A systematic review of the evidence for deprescribing interventions among older people living with frailty

被引:147
作者
Ibrahim, Kinda [1 ,2 ]
Cox, Natalie J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Stevenson, Jennifer M. [5 ,6 ]
Lim, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Fraser, Simon D. S. [2 ,7 ]
Roberts, Helen C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Acad Geriatr Med, Fac Med, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] NIHR Appl Res Collaborat Wessex, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS FT, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Inst Pharmaceut Sci, London, England
[6] Guys & St Thomas NHS FT, Pharm Dept, London, England
[7] Univ Southampton, Fac Med, Primary Care Populat Sci & Med Educ, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Frailty; Deprescribing; Medication review; Polypharmacy; Inappropriate medications; POLYPHARMACY; ADULTS; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-021-02208-8
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundOlder people living with frailty are often exposed to polypharmacy and potential harm from medications. Targeted deprescribing in this population represents an important component of optimizing medication. This systematic review aims to summarise the current evidence for deprescribing among older people living with frailty.MethodsThe literature was searched using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library up to May 2020. Interventional studies with any design or setting were included if they reported deprescribing interventions among people aged 65+ who live with frailty identified using reliable measures. The primary outcome was safety of deprescribing; whereas secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes, medication-related outcomes, feasibility, acceptability and cost-related outcomes. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings and study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.ResultsTwo thousand three hundred twenty-two articles were identified and six (two randomised controlled trials) were included with 657 participants in total (mean age range 79-87years). Studies were heterogeneous in their designs, settings and outcomes. Deprescribing interventions were pharmacist-led (n=3) or multidisciplinary team-led (n=3). Frailty was identified using several measures and deprescribing was implemented using either explicit or implicit tools or both. Three studies reported safety outcomes and showed no significant changes in adverse events, hospitalisation or mortality rates. Three studies reported positive impact on clinical outcomes including depression, mental health status, function and frailty; with mixed findings on falls and cognition; and no significant impact on quality of life. All studies described medication-related outcomes and reported a reduction in potentially inappropriate medications and total number of medications per-patient. Feasibility of deprescribing was reported in four studies which showed that 72-91% of recommendations made were implemented. Two studies evaluated and reported the acceptability of their interventions and further two described cost saving.ConclusionThere is a paucity of research about the impact of deprescribing in older people living with frailty. However, included studies suggest that deprescribing could be safe, feasible, well tolerated and can lead to important benefits. Research should now focus on understanding the impact of deprescribing on frailty status in high risk populations.Trial registrationThe review was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) ID number: CRD42019153367.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ACTRN, 2013, OPTI MED RANDOMISED
[2]   DEFEAT-polypharmacy: deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medicines feasibility trial in residential aged care facilities [J].
Ailabouni, Nagham ;
Mangin, Dee ;
Nishtala, Prasad S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 41 (01) :167-178
[3]   Optimisation of medications used in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Almutairi, Hend ;
Stafford, Andrew ;
Etherton-Beer, Christopher ;
Flicker, Leon .
BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Drug Ther Bull, V54, P69, DOI 10.1136/dtb.2016.6.0408
[5]   A systematic review of the outcomes reported in trials of medication review in older patients: the need for a core outcome set [J].
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste ;
Pont, Lisa G. ;
Thevelin, Stefanie ;
Boland, Benoit ;
Dalleur, Olivia ;
Rutjes, Anne W. S. ;
Westbrook, Johanna I. ;
Spinewine, Anne .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 83 (05) :942-952
[6]   Potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy: application of six sets of published explicit criteria [J].
Chang, Chirn-Bin ;
Chen, Jen-Hau ;
Wen, Chiung-Jung ;
Kuo, Hsu-Ko ;
Lu, I-Shu ;
Chiu, Lee-Shu ;
Wu, Shwu-Chong ;
Chan, Ding-Cheng .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 72 (03) :482-489
[7]   Medication review in hospitalised patients to reduce morbidity and mortality [J].
Christensen, Mikkel ;
Lundh, Andreas .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02)
[8]   Frailty in elderly people [J].
Clegg, Andrew ;
Young, John ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Rikkert, Marcel Olde ;
Rockwood, Kenneth .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9868) :752-762
[9]  
Curtin D, J AM GERIATR SOC
[10]   Deprescribing in older people approaching end-of-life: development and validation of STOPPFrail version 2 [J].
Curtin, Denis ;
Gallagher, Paul ;
O'Mahony, Denis .
AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (02) :465-471