Multi-stage dose expansion cohort (MSDEC) design with Bayesian stopping rule

被引:1
作者
Wang, Shuqi [1 ]
Tan, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Biostat Bioinformat & Biomath, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Bayesian stopping rule; dose expansion cohort; hybrid frequentist-Bayesian method; power prior; MTD; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; POWER PRIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; 2-STAGE DESIGNS; ESCALATION; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2022.2080694
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Phase I trial designs generally fall into three categories: algorithm-based (e.g., the classic 3 + 3 design), model-based (e.g., the continual reassessment method, CRM), and model-assisted designs that combine features of the first two (e.g., the Bayesian Optimal Interval, BOIN, design). The classic '3 + 3' design continues to be the most frequently used design in phase I trials in finding maximum tolerated dose (MTD) due to its simplicity and feasibility, though many other model-based designs such as the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) have also been proposed and used in various such as immunotherapies trials. The MTD based on three or six patients is not accurate, and dose-expansion cohorts (DEC) are increasingly used to better characterize the toxicity profiles of experimental agents. This article proposes a multi-stage dose-expansion cohort (MSDEC) hybrid frequentist-Bayesian design combining the power prior and the sequential conditional probability ratio test. In this design, results from the dose-escalation part are viewed and treated as historical data, and then are weighted and modeled through power prior. For safety monitoring, the Bayesian stopping rule is developed and the maximum sample size is calculated by a fixed-sample-size test with exact binomial computation. Simulation studies showed that MSDEC reduces the chance that a patient experiences a toxic dose. Power prior provides a reasonable prior for the Bayesian model because the degree of informativeness of the prior can be driven by the ("objective") historical data rather than from expert opinion elicited on parameters in the model.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 612
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes [J].
Braun, TA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03) :240-256
[2]   Power prior distributions for generalized linear models [J].
Chen, MH ;
Ibrahim, JG ;
Shao, QM .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2000, 84 (1-2) :121-137
[3]   Evaluation of Statistical Designs in Phase I Expansion Cohorts: The Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Experience [J].
Dahlberg, Suzanne E. ;
Shapiro, Geoffrey I. ;
Clark, Jeffrey W. ;
Johnson, Bruce E. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (07)
[4]  
Geller N.L., 2003, ADV CLIN TRIAL BIOST, P41
[5]   A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in phase I trials [J].
Gönen, M .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 26 (02) :131-140
[6]   Dose Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Trials [J].
Iasonos, Alexia ;
O'Quigley, John .
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (02) :161-170
[7]   Integrating the escalation and dose expansion studies into a unified Phase I clinical trial [J].
Iasonos, Alexia ;
O'Quigley, John .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 50 :124-134
[8]   Early phase clinical trials-are dose expansion cohorts needed? [J].
Iasonos, Alexia ;
O'Quigley, John .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 12 (11) :626-628
[9]   Design Considerations for Dose-Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Trials [J].
Iasonos, Alexia ;
O'Quigley, John .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (31) :4014-+
[10]  
Ibrahim JG, 2000, STAT SCI, V15, P46