Diagnostic Abilities of Variable and Enhanced Corneal Compensation Algorithms of GDx in Different Severities of Glaucoma

被引:1
作者
Yadav, Ravi K. [1 ]
Begum, Viquar U. [1 ]
Addepalli, Uday K. [1 ]
Senthil, Sirisha [1 ]
Garudadri, Chandra S. [1 ]
Rao, Harsha L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] LV Prasad Eye Inst, VST Glaucoma Ctr, Banjara Hills,Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad 500034, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Banjara Hills,Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad 500034, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
scanning laser polarimetry; glaucoma; variable corneal compensation; enhanced corneal compensation; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; NERVE-FIBER LAYER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; SPECTRUM BIAS; BIREFRINGENCE; EYES; ACCURACY; PATTERN; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0000000000000267
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the abilities of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters of variable corneal compensation (VCC) and enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) algorithms of scanning laser polarimetry (GDx) in detecting various severities of glaucoma. Methods: Two hundred and eighty-five eyes of 194 subjects from the Longitudinal Glaucoma Evaluation Study who underwent GDx VCC and ECC imaging were evaluated. Abilities of RNFL parameters of GDx VCC and ECC to diagnose glaucoma were compared using area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivities at fixed specificities, and likelihood ratios. Results: After excluding 5 eyes that failed to satisfy manufacturer-recommended quality parameters with ECC and 68 with VCC, 56 eyes of 41 normal subjects and 161 eyes of 121 glaucoma patients [36 eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, 52 eyes with early (MD > -6 dB), 34 with moderate (MD between -6 and -12 dB), and 39 with severe glaucoma (MD < -12 dB)] were included for the analysis. Inferior RNFL, average RNFL, and nerve fiber indicator parameters showed the best AUCs and sensitivities both with GDx VCC and ECC in diagnosing all severities of glaucoma. AUCs and sensitivities of all RNFL parameters were comparable between the VCC and ECC algorithms (P > 0.20 for all comparisons). Likelihood ratios associated with the diagnostic categorization of RNFL parameters were comparable between the VCC and ECC algorithms. Conclusion: In scans satisfying the manufacturer-recommended quality parameters, which were significantly greater with ECC than VCC algorithm, diagnostic abilities of GDx ECC and VCC in glaucoma were similar.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E93
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2002, 3 (03) :421-432
[2]  
Anderson D R., 1999, Automated Static Perimetry, V2nd, P152
[3]   Quantitative assessment of atypical birefringence images using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation [J].
Bagga, H ;
Greenfield, DS ;
Feuer, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 139 (03) :437-446
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]   SPATIALLY RESOLVED BIREFRINGENCE OF THE RETINAL NERVE-FIBER LAYER ASSESSED WITH A RETINAL LASER ELLIPSOMETER [J].
DREHER, AW ;
REITER, K ;
WEINREB, RN .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1992, 31 (19) :3730-3735
[6]  
FAGAN TJ, 1975, NEW ENGL J MED, V293, P257
[7]   ACCOUNTING FOR THE CORRELATION BETWEEN FELLOW EYES IN REGRESSION-ANALYSIS [J].
GLYNN, RJ ;
ROSNER, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 110 (03) :381-387
[8]   USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .3. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST .B. WHAT ARE THE RESULTS AND WILL THEY HELP ME IN CARING FOR MY PATIENTS [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
GUYATT, GH ;
SACKETT, DL ;
GUYATT, G ;
BASS, E ;
BRILLEDWARDS, P ;
BROWMAN, G ;
COOK, D ;
FARKOUH, M ;
GERSTEIN, H ;
HAYNES, B ;
HAYWARD, R ;
HOLBROOK, A ;
JUNIPER, E ;
LEE, H ;
LEVINE, M ;
MOYER, V ;
NISHIKAWA, J ;
OXMAN, A ;
PATEL, A ;
PHILBRICK, J ;
RICHARDSON, WS ;
SAUVE, S ;
SACKETT, D ;
SINCLAIR, J ;
TROUT, KS ;
TUGWELL, P ;
TUNIS, S ;
WALTER, S ;
WILSON, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (09) :703-707
[9]   Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: Usefulness for clinical decision making and research [J].
Langlotz, CP .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :3-9
[10]   Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests [J].
Lijmer, JG ;
Mol, BW ;
Heisterkamp, S ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Prins, MH ;
van der Meulen, JHP ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (11) :1061-1066