Two-year results after lumbar microdiscectomy with and without prophylaxis of a peridural fibrosis using Adcon-L

被引:50
作者
Ganzer, D
Giese, K
Völker, L
Pietzner, U
Follak, N
Merk, H
机构
[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum Neubrandenburg, Dept Orthoped, D-17022 Neubrandenburg, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Orthoped, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
peridural fibrosis; failed back surgery syndrome; anti-adhesion barrier gel; low-back pain; disc herniation; lumbar spine; sciatica;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-002-0455-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A retrospective study investigated the advantages of the intraoperative application of the anti-adhesion barrier gel Adcon-L after lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods: For the study, 92 patients were recruited. Following the operation, 46 patients (study group) received Adcon-L application. In other 46 patients (control group), wounds were closed without Adcon-L application. Median follow-up was 32 (range 26-33) months in the study group and 37 (range 32-41) months in the control group postoperation. All patients were examined clinically, and spinal MRIs were carried out on 12 randomly selected patients in each group. Results: According to the score of the Low Back Pain Committee of the Japanese Orthopedic Association, no significant clinical difference could be established between the two groups. Subjective evaluation of the operation results (score according to Weber) was not significant. Peridural scarring on the postoperative MRI of 24 patients did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: A significant effect on the clinical results after Adcon-L application could not be found.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] MAROON JC, 1985, CLIN NEUROSURG, V33, P407
  • [22] FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP IN 102 PATIENTS UNDERGOING REPEATED OPERATION
    NORTH, RB
    CAMPBELL, JN
    JAMES, CS
    CONOVERWALKER, MK
    WANG, H
    PIANTADOSI, S
    RYBOCK, JD
    LONG, DM
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 28 (05) : 685 - 691
  • [23] DURATION OF SYMPTOMS AS A PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME AFTER LUMBAR DISC SURGERY
    NYGAARD, OP
    ROMNER, B
    TRUMPY, JH
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1994, 128 (1-4) : 53 - 56
  • [24] No association between peridural scar and outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy
    Nygaard, OP
    Kloster, R
    Dullerud, R
    Jacobsen, EA
    Mellgren, SI
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1997, 139 (12) : 1095 - 1100
  • [25] EXPERIENCE OF MICROSURGICAL COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE IN LUMBAR-DISK OPERATIONS
    NYSTROM, B
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 76 (02): : 129 - 141
  • [26] THE LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY
    PAPAVERO, L
    CASPAR, W
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 64 : 34 - 37
  • [27] PETRIE JL, 1996, EUR SPINE J S, V5, P10, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00298567
  • [28] Inhibition of epidural fibrosis with ADCON®-L:: Effect on clinical outcome one year following re-operation for recurrent lumbar radiculopathy
    Porchet, F
    Lombardi, D
    de Preux, J
    Pople, IK
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 21 : S51 - S60
  • [29] Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: Magnetic resonance evaluation
    Ross, JS
    Robertson, JT
    Frederickson, RCA
    Petrie, JL
    Obuchowski, N
    Modic, MT
    deTribolet, N
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 38 (04) : 855 - 861
  • [30] MR evaluation of epidural fibrosis: Proposed grading system with intra- and inter-observer variability
    Ross, JS
    Obuchowski, N
    Modic, MT
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 21 : S23 - S26