Two-year results after lumbar microdiscectomy with and without prophylaxis of a peridural fibrosis using Adcon-L

被引:50
作者
Ganzer, D
Giese, K
Völker, L
Pietzner, U
Follak, N
Merk, H
机构
[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum Neubrandenburg, Dept Orthoped, D-17022 Neubrandenburg, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Orthoped, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
peridural fibrosis; failed back surgery syndrome; anti-adhesion barrier gel; low-back pain; disc herniation; lumbar spine; sciatica;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-002-0455-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A retrospective study investigated the advantages of the intraoperative application of the anti-adhesion barrier gel Adcon-L after lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods: For the study, 92 patients were recruited. Following the operation, 46 patients (study group) received Adcon-L application. In other 46 patients (control group), wounds were closed without Adcon-L application. Median follow-up was 32 (range 26-33) months in the study group and 37 (range 32-41) months in the control group postoperation. All patients were examined clinically, and spinal MRIs were carried out on 12 randomly selected patients in each group. Results: According to the score of the Low Back Pain Committee of the Japanese Orthopedic Association, no significant clinical difference could be established between the two groups. Subjective evaluation of the operation results (score according to Weber) was not significant. Peridural scarring on the postoperative MRI of 24 patients did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: A significant effect on the clinical results after Adcon-L application could not be found.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] AHMAD S, 1992, J INVEST SURG, V5, P247
  • [2] NO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EPIDURAL FIBROSIS AND SCIATICA IN THE LUMBAR POSTDISKECTOMY SYNDROME - A STUDY WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN SYMPTOMATIC AND ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS
    ANNERTZ, M
    JONSSON, B
    STROMQVIST, B
    HOLTAS, S
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (04) : 449 - 453
  • [3] ANNERTZ M, 1995, NEURORADIOLOGY, V37, P177
  • [4] MICROSURGERY VERSUS STANDARD REMOVAL OF THE HERNIATED LUMBAR-DISK - A 3-YEAR COMPARISON IN 150 CASES
    BARRIOS, C
    AHMED, M
    ARROTEGUI, J
    BJORNSSON, A
    GILLSTROM, P
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 61 (05): : 399 - 403
  • [5] Association between peridural scar and activity-related pain after lumbar discectomy
    BenDebba, M
    van Alphen, HA
    Long, DM
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 21 : S37 - S42
  • [6] Prevention of epidural fibrosis in a prospective series of 100 primary lumbo-sacral discectomy patients: Follow-up and assessment at re-operation
    Brotchi, L
    Pirotte, B
    De Witte, O
    Levivier, M
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 21 : S47 - S50
  • [7] RESULTS OF MICROSURGICAL LUMBAR DISCECTOMY - REVIEW ON 485 PATIENTS
    EBELING, U
    REICHENBERG, W
    REULEN, HJ
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1986, 81 (1-2) : 45 - 52
  • [8] Reduction of peridural fibrosis after lumbar laminotomy and discectomy in dogs by a resorbable gel (ADCON-L)
    Einhaus, SL
    Robertson, JT
    Dohan, FC
    Wujek, JR
    Ahmad, S
    [J]. SPINE, 1997, 22 (13) : 1440 - 1446
  • [9] Fredeman WE, 1996, J PRE-RAPHAELITE ST, V5, P7
  • [10] FRYMOYER J W, 1978, Spine, V3, P1, DOI 10.1097/00007632-197803000-00001