Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan versus Ramipril in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:40
|
作者
Rezq, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Saad, Marwan [1 ,3 ]
El Nozahi, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Dept Cardiol, Abbassia Sq, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Dar Al Fouad Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Cardiovasc Inst, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The role of sacubitril and/or valsartan in patient with heart failure (HF) is established. Whether sacubitril and/or valsartan plays a role in improving outcomes in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. The current study aims to comparing the efficacy and safety of sacubitril and/or valsartan versus ramipril in post-STEMI patients. Patients presenting with STEMI were randomized to receive either sacubitril and/or valsartan or ramipril after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The main efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and HF hospitalizations. Multiple secondary clinical safety and efficacy endpoints were examined. A total of 200 patients were randomized from January 2018 to March 2019, mean age 54.5 +/- 10.4, 87% men, 75% presented with anterior wall STEMI. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The primary endpoint of MACE was similar with sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril at 30 days (p = 0.18); however, at 6 months, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with significant reduction of MACE (p = 0.005), mainly driven by reduction in HF hospitalizations (18% vs 36%, OR 0.40, 95% 0.22 to 0.75; p = 0.004). At 6 months, LV ejection fraction was higher with sacubitril/valsartan (46.8 +/- 12.5% vs 42.09 +/- 13.8%; p = 0.012), with improved LV remodelling (LV end diastolic dimension 50.6 +/- 3.9 mm vs 53.2 +/- 2.7 mm, p = 0.047; and LV end systolic dimension 36.1 +/- 3.4 mm versus 39.9 +/- 6.3 mm, p = 0.001) compared with ramipril. No difference in other efficacy or safety clinical endpoints was observed. In conclusion, early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan may offer clinical benefit and improvement in myocardial remodelling in post-STEMI patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BIVALIRUDIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PHARMACOINVASIVE STRATEGY FOLLOWING FIBRINOLYSIS FOR ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Rashid, Mohammed
    Bernick, Jordan
    Wells, George
    Blondeau, Melissa
    Chong, Aun-Yeong
    Dick, Alexander
    Froeschl, Michael
    Glover, Chris
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    Labinaz, Marino
    Osborne, Christina
    Russo, Juan
    So, Derek
    Le May, Michel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 1192 - 1192
  • [42] Anticoagulation for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Eikelboom, John W.
    Weitz, Jeffrey I.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (09) : 1186 - 1188
  • [43] Monitoring of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Atorvastatin in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Salyamova, Lyudmila I.
    Fadeeva, Svetlana S.
    Golubeva, Alyona V.
    Tomashevskaya, Yuliya A.
    Oleynikov, Valentin E.
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (02) : 190 - 196
  • [44] Laboratory monitoring of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin high doses in myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation
    Oleinikov, V.
    Salyamova, L.
    Tomashevskaya, Y.
    Borisova, N.
    Burko, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 957 - 957
  • [45] Erythropoietin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reply
    Najjar, Samer S.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (07): : 706 - 706
  • [46] EFFICACY OF POSTCONDITIONING COMBINED THROMBUS ASPIRATION IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Watanabe, Takuya
    Niwa, Koichiro
    Niinuma, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E471 - E471
  • [47] The impact of thrombocytopenia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Caldeira, D.
    Morgado, G. J.
    Cruz, I.
    Martins, C.
    Pereira, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1184 - 1184
  • [48] Cardioprotection with adenosine in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Ejder Kardesoglu
    Murat Yalcin
    Zafer Isilak
    Omer Uz
    Murat Atalay
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2012, (18) : 3343 - 3343
  • [49] Conservative strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Zalewski, Jaroslaw
    Nycz, Krzysztof
    Przewlocki, Tadeusz
    Durak, Monika
    Andres, Marek
    Lech, Piotr
    Pieniazek, Piotr
    Zmudka, Krzysztof
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2010, 6 (03): : 97 - 103
  • [50] Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Lee, Seung-Jun
    Cho, Jae Young
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    Yun, Kyeong Ho
    Suh, Yongsung
    Cho, Yun-Hyeong
    Kim, Yong Hoon
    Her, Ae-Young
    Cho, Sungsoo
    Jeon, Dong Woon
    Yoo, Sang-Yong
    Cho, Deok-Kyu
    Hong, Bum-Kee
    Kwon, Hyuck Moon
    Hong, Sung-Jin
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Shin, Dong-Ho
    Nam, Chung-Mo
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Ko, Young-Guk
    Choi, Donghoon
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Jang, Yangsoo
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (04) : 431 - 440